A review of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's international education surveys: Governance, human capital discourses, and policy debates

Abstract

Given the influential role that the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) plays in educational governance, we believe it is timely to provide an in-depth review of its education surveys and their associated human capital discourses. By reviewing and summarizing the OECD's suite of education surveys, this paper identifies the ways in which the OECD frames these surveys and embeds them in human capital discourses. We observe that the OECD's large-scale education surveys contribute to its growing cognitive and normative governance role in the global governance of education. The significance of our analysis lies in highlighting these surveys' truth claims as objective measures of human capital while at the same time pointing to their contested and controversial role in broader educational debates. We focus on three contested terrains: student testing, educational system improvement, and the politics of educational reform. In conclusion, we suggest that there is a need for an alternative paradigmone that values the significant role that public schools play in building socially cohesive and equitable societies.

Problem-Solving as a Governing Knowledge: “Skills”-Testing in PISA and PIAAC

“…The OECD has developed a conceptual architecture around "problems" and "problem-solving", which forms part of a vast web of interrelated concepts, including "wellbeing" (OECD, 2015) and "human capital" (Morgan & Volante, 2016). The list below is illustrative rather than comprehensive:…”

(Un)intended consequences of the 2016 educational reform on early childhood education and care in Poland. The story of a few applications that led to significant disorder

“…In Poland, the growing interest in ECEC is associated with membership of the European Union (from 1 May 2004). Belonging to transnational structures resulted in, as in other modern countries, the growing influence of international discourse on national education policy (Morgan and Volante, 2016). As a result, in Poland, at the strategic level, we are dealing with the implementation of EU development priorities, among which the universal availability and affordability of high-quality early education and childcare occupies one of the central places.…”

Ideal teachers according to TALIS: Societal orientations of education and the global diagnosis of teacher self-efficacy

“…The underlying assumption is that the OECD educational surveys measure the ‘proper skills’ and that, therefore, governments should tailor their educational policies and reforms according to the findings of these surveys if they wish to maximize their human capital (Berkovich and Benoliel, 2020a; Morgan and Shahjahan, 2014). Scholars have argued that such surveys are political tools that promote wider neoliberal political objectives, infringing upon teachers’ professional autonomy (Morgan and Volante, 2016). According to the critical literature, international assessment tools presume to present ‘knowledge for policy’ as ‘objective’ data; however, in practice they include a specific definition of a ‘problem’ and a specific ‘preferred solution’ (Rinne and Ozga, 2013).…”