Persulfate (PS)-based advanced oxidation
processes (AOPs) have
been promoted as alternatives to H2O2-based
AOPs. To gauge the potential of this technology, the PS/Fe(II) and
Fenton (H2O2/Fe(II)) processes were comparatively
evaluated using formate as a simple target compound and nanofiltration
concentrate from a municipal wastewater treatment plant as a complex
suite of contaminants with the aid of kinetic modeling. In terms of
the short-term rate and extent of mineralization of formate and the
nanofiltration concentrate, PS/Fe(II) is less effective due to slow
Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycling attributable to the scavenging of superoxide
by PS. However, in the concentrate treatment, PS/Fe(II) provided a
sustained removal of total organic carbon (TOC), with ∼81%
removed after 7 days with SO4
•– consistently produced via homolysis of the long-life PS. In comparison,
H2O2/Fe(II) exhibited limited TOC removal over
∼57% after 10 h due to the futile consumption of H2O2 by HO•. PS/Fe(II) also offers better
performance at transforming humic-like moieties to more biodegradable
compounds as a result of chlorine radicals formed by the reaction
of SO4
•– with the matrix constituents
present in the concentrate. The application of PS/Fe(II) is, however,
subject to the limitations of slow oxidation of organic contaminants,
release of sulfate, and formation of chlorinated byproducts.