2022
DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.21.580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Types and Characteristics of Healthy Life Expectancy and Methodological Issues

Abstract: An index that evaluates the health level of a population group considering both death and loss of function due to disease is called a summary measure of population health (SMPH). SMPHs are broadly divided into life year indices and life expectancy indices, the latter of which comprise healthy life expectancy (HLE). HLE is included as a policy target in various national and regional level healthcare plans, and the term “HLE” is commonly used in academia and by the public. However, the overall level of understan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a comparison of the age-standardized mortality rates among the 17 municipal and provincial regions (hereafter “17 regions”) shows no significant changes over time in the disparities between the regions showing the highest and lowest mortality rates. 1 Regarding the regional health inequalities for healthy life expectancy, differences between the regions showing the highest and lowest health-adjusted life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, which are widely used measures of healthy life expectancy, 2 are 3.2 and 4.6 years, respectively. 3 4 Another study found that the regional disparity in health-adjusted life expectancy increased from 4.9 years in 2008 to 5.7 years in 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a comparison of the age-standardized mortality rates among the 17 municipal and provincial regions (hereafter “17 regions”) shows no significant changes over time in the disparities between the regions showing the highest and lowest mortality rates. 1 Regarding the regional health inequalities for healthy life expectancy, differences between the regions showing the highest and lowest health-adjusted life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, which are widely used measures of healthy life expectancy, 2 are 3.2 and 4.6 years, respectively. 3 4 Another study found that the regional disparity in health-adjusted life expectancy increased from 4.9 years in 2008 to 5.7 years in 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, interest in healthy life expectancy as a quality indicator of life has grown. Healthy life expectancy is defined as the average number of years that a person can expect to live at a certain level of health 43 . Recently, healthy life expectancy has been prolonging, 33,44 but the gap between average life expectancy and healthy life expectancy (the period during which people need care for their daily lives) has not shortened 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy life expectancy is defined as the average number of years that a person can expect to live at a certain level of health. 43 Recently, healthy life expectancy has been prolonging, 33,44 but the gap between average life expectancy and healthy life expectancy (the period during which people need care for their daily lives) has not shortened. 44 Older people enjoy life individually in various ways and their subjective well-being does not necessarily correspond to their need for daily care.…”
Section: Changes In Health Orientation-related Concepts For Older Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QALY is a measure of disease burden, including both the quality and the quantity of life lived (establishing the cost of a new drug, technology or a health care intervention). The QALY can be used to provide a value for these treatments or interventions that can be used for comparison between new and previously established treatments [ 11 ]. Therefore, the QALY allows us to turn the lock of a cost-benefit-analysis of medical interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%