2003
DOI: 10.1097/00001504-200309000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the validity of self-reported arrests among persons with mental illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crisanti et al, 2003;Thornberry and Krohn, 2000;Junger-Tas and Haen Marshall, 1999), there are also some limitations with regard to the present study. The extent of abuse and neglect by professional caregivers of home care services is probably underestimated for several reasons.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Crisanti et al, 2003;Thornberry and Krohn, 2000;Junger-Tas and Haen Marshall, 1999), there are also some limitations with regard to the present study. The extent of abuse and neglect by professional caregivers of home care services is probably underestimated for several reasons.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Memory for any behavior is more likely to be accurate for shorter compared to longer periods and for questions that do not require detailed accounts (Crisanti, Laygo, & Junginger, 2003). The accuracy observed in this study may be the result of the brief three-month duration of follow-up in our study and of the general nature of the question ''Have you been arrested?''.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Because these behaviors are socially undesirable and stigmatized, they are likely to be underreported (e.g., Harrison, 1997;Kessler, Chiu, Demler, & Walters, 2005), even with the methodological improvements in the 2002 NSDUH data collection protocols, such as the use of ACAI (see USDHHS, SAMHSA, OAS, 2004). On the other hand, although a review of research on self-reported arrests among those with SMI found problems with underreporting, as with all stigmatized behaviors, it also concluded that self-reported arrest data are reasonably accurate and useful for research purposes (Crisanti, Laygo, & Jungiger, 2003). Unfortunately, because the public use NSDUH data are anonymous, it is impossible to conduct a validity check by using official arrest records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%