2015
DOI: 10.3390/computation3010029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Two Multiscale Methods for the Simulation of Macromolecular Assemblies: Multiscale Perturbation and Multiscale Factorization

Abstract: Abstract:Many mesoscopic N -atom systems derive their structural and dynamical properties from processes coupled across multiple scales in space and time. That is, they simultaneously deform or display collective behaviors, while experiencing atomic scale vibrations and collisions. Due to the large number of atoms involved and the need to simulate over long time periods of biological interest, traditional computational tools, like molecular dynamics, are often infeasible for such systems. Hence, in the current… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of continuum-microstate coevolution approaches has been placed within the framework of multiscale perturbation theory; the result was Langevin equations for CG continuum variables that coevolve with the many-particle microstate. , In previous studies, multiscale factorization (MF) was developed and used to coevolve the microstate and the CG state. ,, MF carries out the microstate and CG coevolution taking into account the time scale separation between atomistic and CG dynamics, as well as the stationarity principle of atomistic fluctuations. , Most closely related to the energy transfer approach presented here is the previous work where the internal energy of a system is considered to be a slowly varying CG variable that coevolves with the rapidly fluctuating atomistic degrees of freedom . The analysis of nanosystems using density-like field variables, within a CG-microstate coevolution scheme that follows from the all-atom physics, accounts for dynamical phenomena that cannot be described by classical phenomenological continuum models which miss the intrinsic random atomic vibrations and Boltzmann distribution of velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of continuum-microstate coevolution approaches has been placed within the framework of multiscale perturbation theory; the result was Langevin equations for CG continuum variables that coevolve with the many-particle microstate. , In previous studies, multiscale factorization (MF) was developed and used to coevolve the microstate and the CG state. ,, MF carries out the microstate and CG coevolution taking into account the time scale separation between atomistic and CG dynamics, as well as the stationarity principle of atomistic fluctuations. , Most closely related to the energy transfer approach presented here is the previous work where the internal energy of a system is considered to be a slowly varying CG variable that coevolves with the rapidly fluctuating atomistic degrees of freedom . The analysis of nanosystems using density-like field variables, within a CG-microstate coevolution scheme that follows from the all-atom physics, accounts for dynamical phenomena that cannot be described by classical phenomenological continuum models which miss the intrinsic random atomic vibrations and Boltzmann distribution of velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of continuum-microstate coevolution approaches has been placed within the framework of multiscale perturbation theory; the result was Langevin equations for CG continuum variables that coevolve with the many-particle microstate. 26,27 In previous studies, multiscale factorization (MF) 28 was developed and used to coevolve the microstate and the CG state. 7,28,29 MF carries out the microstate and CG coevolution taking into account the time scale separation between atomistic and CG dynamics, as well as the stationarity principle of atomistic fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%