2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Validity Evidence Presented in the Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (2002–2012): Misconceptions and Recommendations for Validation Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting Kappa coefficient of 1.00 indicated that evaluators agreed perfectly upon test items' underlying dimensions and construct validity coefficients for individual items; and the total scale coefficient was above.80, suggesting adequate content validity of the entire scale (Herna´ndez-Nieto, 2002). The importance of assessing content validity was asserted by the GCQ's authors (Paradis et al, 2014), though it is a commonly overlooked process in scale adaptation within the sport psychology literature (Gunnell et al, 2014). Study 1 provided the support for the P-GCQ's content validity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The resulting Kappa coefficient of 1.00 indicated that evaluators agreed perfectly upon test items' underlying dimensions and construct validity coefficients for individual items; and the total scale coefficient was above.80, suggesting adequate content validity of the entire scale (Herna´ndez-Nieto, 2002). The importance of assessing content validity was asserted by the GCQ's authors (Paradis et al, 2014), though it is a commonly overlooked process in scale adaptation within the sport psychology literature (Gunnell et al, 2014). Study 1 provided the support for the P-GCQ's content validity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In accordance with the standards framework (see Gunnell et al, 2014), as many of the questionnaire scales used in the present study were either newly developed or new to the OAE context, their reliability and validity were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; Amos Version 6.0; Table 2). To ensure adequate model fit, exploratory CFAs were conducted, and problem items inspected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thestrengths included a large sample size, the use of baseline measures, exploring both outcomes and predictor variables, and introducing a range of questionnaires to the OAE literature. However, while evidence of their validity is provided, the exploratory nature of the CFA analysis used in some of these questionnaires means that further validity checks are required with new samples and contexts (as recommended by the standards framework; Gunnell et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a similar vein, the current version of the APA standards (APA/AERA, 1999 indicates that discriminant and convergence validity evidence should be established through correlations of test scores with scores from different instruments and not with different subscales, as noted by Gunnell et al (2014). Almost 60 years after, the CFA framework renders the MTMM method an equally valuable tool to the classic MTMM when first introduced (Koch et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%