2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-020-00732-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Wire Rope Detection Methods, Sensors and Signal Processing Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the nondestructive testing of steel wire rope, permanent magnetic leakage detection devices have been widely adopted [14,15]. The three main types of permanent magnetization sensors for steel wire rope are depicted in Figure 2: (a) a sensor of the magnetic…”
Section: Open-loop Permanent Magnetizermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the nondestructive testing of steel wire rope, permanent magnetic leakage detection devices have been widely adopted [14,15]. The three main types of permanent magnetization sensors for steel wire rope are depicted in Figure 2: (a) a sensor of the magnetic…”
Section: Open-loop Permanent Magnetizermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NDT methods for wire rope include magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing methods [7,8], ultrasonic testing (UT) methods [9], X-ray inspection [10], acoustic emission (AE) inspection methods [11,12], and eddy current testing (ECT) methods [13]. Among them, the MFL testing method is considered to be the most effective method for detecting wire rope defects [14,15]. For the purpose of enhancing the sensitivity and effectiveness of signal acquisition of leakage magnetic fields at defects, it is necessary for the structural design of the MFL detection device and the magnetic sensitivity sensor to be optimized in order to increase the ability of the MFL device to stimulate leakage magnetic fields at defects and also to increase the ability of the magnetic sensitivity sensor to acquire signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed for the non-destructive testing of wire ropes. Most of the current studies are focused on methods such as ultrasonic detection [ 3 ], electromagnetic detection [ 4 ], X-ray detection, and magnetostriction [ 5 ], as well as eddy current, current, and vibration detection [ 6 , 7 ]. The electromagnetic detection method is the most widely implemented method, owing to its demonstrated reliability and practicality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entropy 2022, 24, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 tromagnetic detection [4], X-ray detection, and magnetostriction [5], as well as eddy current, current, and vibration detection [6,7]. The electromagnetic detection method is the most widely implemented method, owing to its demonstrated reliability and practicality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of testing with eddy currents are the high efficiency of detecting even the most minor defects, no need for direct access, and the penetration of many layers of material [11,12]. The main disadvantage of this method is that it only detects defects located not too deep under the surface due to the skin effect, which is especially strong in the case of ferromagnetic materials [13];…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%