2020
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2020.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on chemical and mechanical phenomena at the wafer interface during chemical mechanical planarization

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preston's equation was frequently used to explain the changes of MRR with the rotation speed in CMP technology. According to Preston equation [6] MRR = kp𝜐 (2) where MRR is the material removal rate, k is the Preston coefficient, p is the applied pressure on the wafer surface, and ʋ is the relative velocity between the wafer and the polishing pad. MRR was a linear relationship between MRR and ʋ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Preston's equation was frequently used to explain the changes of MRR with the rotation speed in CMP technology. According to Preston equation [6] MRR = kp𝜐 (2) where MRR is the material removal rate, k is the Preston coefficient, p is the applied pressure on the wafer surface, and ʋ is the relative velocity between the wafer and the polishing pad. MRR was a linear relationship between MRR and ʋ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference was possible dependent on piezoelectric effect in piezo-CMP, because the Preston equation was only a classic equation to describe contact mechanics, and did not consider the effect of the piezo-catalysis. [6] For example, according to the following formulae of piezopotential:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, PAA-coated ceria particles are known to undergo transitions of bridging agglomeration-stable-flocculation depending on their physicochemical conditions such as pH, ionic strength, temperature, and concentration 63 . In this case, the polymer interferes with the interaction among particles, so that they do not come into direct contact with each other, however, it is difficult to confirm that the dispersibility of a solution is good due to the bridging agglomeration of nanoparticles by polymers 35 , 64 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the polymer interferes with the interaction among particles, so that they do not come into direct contact with each other, however, it is difficult to confirm that the dispersibility of a solution is good due to the bridging agglomeration of nanoparticles by polymers 35 , 64 . In this experiment, the ceria particles have negative potential because the pH of the slurry was adjusted to 9 63 . The repulsive force between a polymer and a particle surface becomes strong with increasing pH, which hinders the adsorption of polyacids on the ceria surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%