2019
DOI: 10.32362/2500-316x-2019-7-5-30-46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on control systems hardware and software for robots of various scale and purpose. Part 1. Industrial robotics

Abstract: В работе представлен обзор роботов различного масштаба и назначения. В ходе обзора анализируются применяемые аппаратные и программные решения и обобщаются наиболее распространенные структурные схемы систем управления. По результатам обзора проводится анализ подходов к масштабированию систем управления, применению алгоритмов интеллектуального управления, обеспечению отказоустойчивости, снижению массогабаритных размеров элементов систем управления, свойственных для разных классов роботов. Целью работы является п… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximity in HRC -Cobots are envisioned to be in "cage-free" environments, sharing a workspace and collaborating closely with human workers [26]. As these cage-free systems can prove detrimental due to the potential for collision, several works have attempted to create safe human-robot collaboration via algorithmic advancements [41,47,54], designing different manipulation techniques to stop the robot from causing bodily harm in alignment with industry guidelines [59]. Another approach has been to design compliant robots to ensure safety in proximate HRC settings [34,61,75].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximity in HRC -Cobots are envisioned to be in "cage-free" environments, sharing a workspace and collaborating closely with human workers [26]. As these cage-free systems can prove detrimental due to the potential for collision, several works have attempted to create safe human-robot collaboration via algorithmic advancements [41,47,54], designing different manipulation techniques to stop the robot from causing bodily harm in alignment with industry guidelines [59]. Another approach has been to design compliant robots to ensure safety in proximate HRC settings [34,61,75].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter case becomes more and more popular as it makes it easy to support different types of end effectors developed independently from the robot. Simple grippers are usually controlled by 24V digital outputs, while more complex ones use bi-directional industrial fieldbuses [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscript 𝑖= (1,2,3) indicates the three delta robot arm legs The delta robot's direct kinematics or forward kinematic, which addresses the unknown positions are P = [𝑋 𝑝 , 𝑌 𝑝 , 𝑍 𝑝 ], for a set of angles θi1 for each arm i= (1,2,3) of the motor, whereas for inverse kinematic, the desired P to the specific position of the end effector determines the angle of motor θi1 for each arm i= (1,2,3) at the base platform. The conversion calculator for inverse and forward kinematic can be easily found in [25].…”
Section: Delta Robot Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robots are programmable devices that have been created to carry out many jobs as part of future progress in many fields of technology and development [1]. Robots are becoming more flexible because of constant research and development in robotic software and hardware [2]. In every element of life, robots have become prevalent and have been utilised in medical operations, human aid, factory automation, logistics and delivery, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%