2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review On digital image processing techniques for in-Vivo confocal images of the cornea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, several new approaches to estimate the corneal endothelial parameters have been proposed. Up to 2018, the methods were based on image processing techniques and classic machine learning [13][14][15][16][17] , but from 2018 onward, a significantly large number of new approaches based on deep learning have been presented [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . Overall, these methods have shown a good performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several new approaches to estimate the corneal endothelial parameters have been proposed. Up to 2018, the methods were based on image processing techniques and classic machine learning [13][14][15][16][17] , but from 2018 onward, a significantly large number of new approaches based on deep learning have been presented [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . Overall, these methods have shown a good performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative analysis of corneal nerves have been reviewed adequately in three review papers published in 2018 [ 83 ], 2019 [ 84 ] and 2021 [ 85 ]. Petropoulos et al [ 86 ] suggested corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to be the final step to arrive at conclusions related to peripheral and central neuro-degenerative conditions.…”
Section: Corneal Nerve Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small field of view, the image acquisition area when sampling, quality of the images, and image analysis methods, all introduce biases to the sampling methodology. Further, the time required to analyse the images needs to be shortened before the instrument is efficient in clinical practice (Herrera-Pereda et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%