2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2471-9_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on fMRI Signal Analysis and Brain Mapping Methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Invasive equipment like Electrocorticography (ECoG) (Schalk and Leuthardt 2011) have high resolution, but their invasiveness and discomfort limit their effective usefulness. Noninvasive approaches include Magnetoencephalography (MEG) (Mellinger et al 2007), functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) (Raut and Yadav 2017), functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) (Naseer and Hong 2015), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) (Deore, Chaudhari, and Mehrotra 2013), Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) (Bhattacharyya et al 2016), and Electroencephalography (EEG) (Moghimi et al 2013). fMRI and fNIRS based BCIs have limited speed.…”
Section: Acquisition Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive equipment like Electrocorticography (ECoG) (Schalk and Leuthardt 2011) have high resolution, but their invasiveness and discomfort limit their effective usefulness. Noninvasive approaches include Magnetoencephalography (MEG) (Mellinger et al 2007), functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) (Raut and Yadav 2017), functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) (Naseer and Hong 2015), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) (Deore, Chaudhari, and Mehrotra 2013), Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) (Bhattacharyya et al 2016), and Electroencephalography (EEG) (Moghimi et al 2013). fMRI and fNIRS based BCIs have limited speed.…”
Section: Acquisition Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%