2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.01857
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on minimax rates in change point detection and localisation

Yi Yu

Abstract: This paper reviews recent developments in fundamental limits and optimal algorithms for change point analysis. We focus on minimax optimal rates in change point detection and localisation, in both parametric and nonparametric models. We start with the univariate mean change point analysis problem and review the state-of-the-art results in the literature. We then move on to more complex data types and investigate general principles behind the optimal procedures that lead to minimax rate-optimal results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
(182 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two types of control share many similarities but with some subtle differences: controlling the overall false alarm probability is more preferable in theoretical analysis and controlling the average run length is handier in practice. We refer readers to Yu et al (2020) for detailed discussions on this matter and stick with controlling the overall false alarm probability in this paper.…”
Section: Problem Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These two types of control share many similarities but with some subtle differences: controlling the overall false alarm probability is more preferable in theoretical analysis and controlling the average run length is handier in practice. We refer readers to Yu et al (2020) for detailed discussions on this matter and stick with controlling the overall false alarm probability in this paper.…”
Section: Problem Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of the matrix estimation, we also have the change point analysis procedure. In 3, for notational simplicity, we present a rather expensive procedure exploiting all integer pairs s < t. In fact, without any loss of statistical accuracy, one can instead exploit a dyadic grid s ∈ {(t − 2 j ) ∨ 1} j∈N * , for any t ≥ 2, see Yu et al (2020) for detailed discussions. This means, for every newly collected time point t ≥ 2, the additional cost of estimating the change point is of order O{log(t)Q}, where Q is the cost of 1.…”
Section: The Change Point Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When V = V * , we see that the localisation rate is, aside from a poly-logarithmic factor, of order σ 2 κ −2 p,n s. This type of guarantee is consistent with analogous results established in array of change point detection problems and implies the nearoptimality of our results. Indeed, in change point detection problems, minimax lower bounds on the localisation errors are usually of the form of σ 2 κ −2 and their upper bounds obtained by polynomialtime algorithms are usually in the form of σ 2 κ −2 × a sparsity parameter × a logarithmic factor, see Yu (2020).…”
Section: The Localisation Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a vast body of literature discussing the detection boundary and optimal estimation in the offline change point analysis (e.g. Verzelen et al, 2020;Yu, 2020). Their counterparts in online change point analysis are relatively scarce and existing work includes univariate mean change (e.g.…”
Section: Summary Of Contributions and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%