2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on properties of cement-based composites doped with graphene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FG-modified mixtures show ∼40–70% and 10–50% higher strength compared to the control mortar at 1 and 3 d, respectively; the corresponding increases for RG-modified mixtures are ∼20–60% and 10–25%, respectively. Recent publications have highlighted notable disparities in the optimal dosages of GO/rGO and GNPs dosages for enhancing the mechanical properties of cement-based systems. ,,, In general, GO-modified mixtures (with comparable w/c as used here) showed an increase of ∼20–40% at early ages (at 3 and 7 d) at various GO contents (0.02–0.30% by mass of cement); while GNP-modified mixtures showed strength improvement of 30–60% after 28 d at significantly higher dosages of ∼0.40–0.80% by mass of cement. ,,, rGO-modified mixtures are reported to show 10–15% increase in compressive strength compared to control mortar mixtures at dosages of 0.02–0.06% by mass of cement (similar to the dosages used in this study) . This shows that FG and RG can be used in dosages similar to or less than those used in other studies with GNPs, GO, and rGO to obtain comparable strength enhancements.…”
Section: Structure and Properties Of Fg- And Rg-modified Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The FG-modified mixtures show ∼40–70% and 10–50% higher strength compared to the control mortar at 1 and 3 d, respectively; the corresponding increases for RG-modified mixtures are ∼20–60% and 10–25%, respectively. Recent publications have highlighted notable disparities in the optimal dosages of GO/rGO and GNPs dosages for enhancing the mechanical properties of cement-based systems. ,,, In general, GO-modified mixtures (with comparable w/c as used here) showed an increase of ∼20–40% at early ages (at 3 and 7 d) at various GO contents (0.02–0.30% by mass of cement); while GNP-modified mixtures showed strength improvement of 30–60% after 28 d at significantly higher dosages of ∼0.40–0.80% by mass of cement. ,,, rGO-modified mixtures are reported to show 10–15% increase in compressive strength compared to control mortar mixtures at dosages of 0.02–0.06% by mass of cement (similar to the dosages used in this study) . This shows that FG and RG can be used in dosages similar to or less than those used in other studies with GNPs, GO, and rGO to obtain comparable strength enhancements.…”
Section: Structure and Properties Of Fg- And Rg-modified Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recent publications have highlighted notable disparities in the optimal dosages of GO/rGO and GNPs dosages for enhancing the mechanical properties of cement-based systems. 7,14,40,63 In general, GO-modified mixtures (with comparable w/c as used here) showed an increase of ∼20−40% at early ages (at 3 and 7 d) at various GO contents (0.02−0.30% by mass of cement); 64−66 while GNP-modified mixtures showed strength improvement of 30−60% after 28 d at significantly higher dosages of ∼0.40−0.80% by mass of cement. 2,64,67,68 rGOmodified mixtures are reported to show 10−15% increase in compressive strength compared to control mortar mixtures at dosages of 0.02−0.06% by mass of cement (similar to the dosages used in this study).…”
Section: Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[6,7]. The addition of carbon nanomaterials to cementitious materials can improve many aspects of electrical conductivity, mechanical properties, crack resistance, durability, and thermal conductivity [6][7][8][9]. It is widely accepted that the dispersion of carbon nanomaterials is still the key factor inhibiting the performance of composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%