2021
DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2021.2018938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on qualification and certification for metal additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CT offers many advantages in the inspection of 3D-printed products and processes; however, there is a limitation in micrometer-scaled measurements. The inspection method for geometry or internal defects of 3D-printed products in real-time during printing or after fabrication has not been standardized yet 34 36 . Nevertheless, CT is a good inspection tool for non-destructive testing 37 ; internal pores and porosity are detected without destruction, but micrometer-scaled measurements are not reproducible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT offers many advantages in the inspection of 3D-printed products and processes; however, there is a limitation in micrometer-scaled measurements. The inspection method for geometry or internal defects of 3D-printed products in real-time during printing or after fabrication has not been standardized yet 34 36 . Nevertheless, CT is a good inspection tool for non-destructive testing 37 ; internal pores and porosity are detected without destruction, but micrometer-scaled measurements are not reproducible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, through this consistency we are able to provides accurate quantification of flaws, shape, size/morphology, and study their impact on the mechanical performance and properties of the printed part. This is a major step toward qualification and certification of AM parts that has historically been a bottleneck preventing AM from reaching full potential 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main barrier to the large-scale adoption of these technologies in the industry is the limited availability of regulations covering the different aspects of AM, including raw material quality, design guidelines, fabrication and postprocessing techniques, material testing, and inspection of the final components. This obliges companies to make considerable efforts in terms of investigation and testing to qualify and certify AM products prior to market launch, which may result in extremely high costs and long lead times [53]. In addition, compared to traditional fabrication methods, AM processes often exhibit poor repeatability and reproducibility [54,55], and the relationship between manufacturing route, material characteristics, and final product quality still needs to be thoroughly explored [53].…”
Section: Applications Of Additively Manufactured Pure Copper Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This obliges companies to make considerable efforts in terms of investigation and testing to qualify and certify AM products prior to market launch, which may result in extremely high costs and long lead times [53]. In addition, compared to traditional fabrication methods, AM processes often exhibit poor repeatability and reproducibility [54,55], and the relationship between manufacturing route, material characteristics, and final product quality still needs to be thoroughly explored [53].…”
Section: Applications Of Additively Manufactured Pure Copper Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%