“…Figure 3B showed that the characteristic diffractions of the as-prepared CdHgTe samples were correspond to the (111), ( 220) and (311) crystal face diffraction of the cubic system, with the 2θ and d values of (24.42°, 0.369nm), (40.60°, 0.222nm) and (47.08°, 0.193nm), which demonstrated that the crystalline phase of the as-prepared QDs was similar to the sphalerite type cubic syngony of HgTe. The diffractions appeared in Figure 3D at (003) (11.02°, 0.802nm), (006) (22.15°, 0.401nm), (0012) (33.14°, 0.270nm), (0015) (37.31°, 0.241nm), (110) (57.64°, 0.160nm) and (113) (58.89°, 0.157nm) were used to identify the DMF lattice, based on which the DMF lattice was indexed as the R-hexagonal lattice of magnetic layered compound hydroxide [14,15,17] . The characteristic diffraction peaks of the CdHgTe@DMF samples were almost similar to that of CdHgTe and its standard reference crystalline phase 32-0665, while the characteristic diffractions of DMF [14,15,17] were not obvious except a weak diffraction of (006) (23.55 °, 0.377nm), as shown in Figure 3C, due to the fact that the majority part in the composite was CdHgTe, the percentage of DMF was relatively small (the molar ratio of CdHgTe/DMF was 3: 1).…”