2015 International Conference on Pervasive Computing (ICPC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/pervasive.2015.7087096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on speech enhancement techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have been searching for biomarkers in SF that can be used to diagnose OA earlier and with greater reliability. However, the composition of SF is complex, and it is difficult to effectively study its single components, so it requires the development of signal enhancement techniques [ 115 ]. As an important component of SF, HA has attracted the attention of researchers.…”
Section: Raman Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have been searching for biomarkers in SF that can be used to diagnose OA earlier and with greater reliability. However, the composition of SF is complex, and it is difficult to effectively study its single components, so it requires the development of signal enhancement techniques [ 115 ]. As an important component of SF, HA has attracted the attention of researchers.…”
Section: Raman Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An essential part of speech signal processing is also the suppression of additive noise in the speech signal using single-channel or multichannel methods [ 61 ], for example, single-channel methods like speech enhancement using spectral subtraction-type algorithms [ 62 ], use of complex adaptive methods of signal processing [ 63 , 64 ], model-based speech enhancement [ 65 , 66 ], increasing additive noise removal in speech processing using spectral subtraction [ 67 ], and noise reduction of speech signal using wavelet transform with modified universal threshold [ 68 ] or denoising speech signals by wavelet transform [ 69 ]. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial attempts at speech denoising involved applying linear filters to the mixture to reduce or eliminate the noise portion, most prominently Wiener filtering [25], by estimating the noise statistics. In this review, speech denoising methods are placed into two main categories [26][27][28][29]: conventional methods, including Wiener filtering, spectral subtraction, and Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) methods [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and more recent deep learning-based methods [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Conventional methods attempt to estimate the statistical attributes in the mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%