A Review on Tailoring Stiffness in Compliant Systems, via Removing Material: Cellular Materials and Topology Optimization

Abstract

Cellular Materials and Topology Optimization use a structured distribution of material to achieve specific mechanical properties. The controlled distribution of material often leads to several advantages including the customization of the resulting mechanical properties; this can be achieved following these two approaches. In this work, a review of these two as approaches used with compliance purposes applied at flexure level is presented. The related literature is assessed with the aim of clarifying how they can be used in tailoring stiffness of flexure elements. Basic concepts needed to understand the fundamental process of each approach are presented. Further, tailoring stiffness is described as an evolutionary process used in compliance applications. Additionally, works that used these approaches to tailor stiffness of flexure elements are described and categorized. Finally, concluding remarks and recommendations to further extend the study of these two approaches in tailoring the stiffness of flexure elements are discussed.

MaSMaker: An open-source, portable software to create and integrate maze-like surfaces into arbitrary geometries

“…The rapid technological growth of Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes in the last two decades has raised great interest in these technologies due to its potential applications, capability to produce near net-shape parts, the freedom of design they have to offer, and a set of advantages worth exploiting, such as part consolidation [1,2], topology optimization [3] and lightweighting [4], to name a few. In fact, AM allows fabrication of complex geometries impossible to build using traditional manufacturing techniques.…”

Finite-time hybrid motion/deformation terminal control for rigid/compliant systems using acceleration-based quadratic objective function

“…Compliant structures are receiving increasing attention in a variety of fields [5][6][7] , because of the unique advantages compared to traditional mechanisms, including the elimination of sliding contact between surfaces, monolithic manufacturing, higher precision, reduced friction, and reduced weight [8] . Deformation and vibration control and its integration with motion control bring a new challenge to the design and control of new concept compliant structures.…”

Prediction of Flow Properties of Porous Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Structures

“…Additive manufacturing (AM), most commonly known as 3D printing, comprises a set of seven families of different technologies that are used to fabricate prototypes and devices in a layer-by-layer manner. The rapid technological growth of AM provides engineers with almost unlimited freedom of design, as well as a set of advantages over traditional manufacturing techniques, such as the possibility to build lightweight structures [17], topologically optimized parts [18], and part consolidation [19,20], all of which are based on the fact that AM allows for the printing of complex structures easily. In particular, Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) structures fabricated by AM are promising complex structures for the enhancement of different applications in which fluid flow is involved.…”