2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40899-021-00584-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on the applications of machine learning for runoff modeling

Abstract: The growing menace of global warming and restrictions on access to water in each region is a huge threat to global hydrological sustainability. Hence, the perspective at which hydrological studies are currently being carried out across the world to quantify and understand the water cycle modeling requires a further boost. In the past few decades, the theoretical understanding of machine learning (ML) algorithms for solving engineering issues, and the application of this method to practical problems have made v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the easiest way to implement the model, associated to the low computation cost, as well as the fast training, validation, testing and evaluation with high performance compared to the physical models make it more accessible to the users. Several authors mentioned the accuracy of the machine learning models in comparison to the physical models (Mohammadi, 2021). Also according to Agudelo-Otalora et al (2018); Kratzert et al (2019) data driven models (such as machine learning) have proven to be even better than the physical, conceptual models in flood forecasting studies.…”
Section: Data Driven Model/machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the easiest way to implement the model, associated to the low computation cost, as well as the fast training, validation, testing and evaluation with high performance compared to the physical models make it more accessible to the users. Several authors mentioned the accuracy of the machine learning models in comparison to the physical models (Mohammadi, 2021). Also according to Agudelo-Otalora et al (2018); Kratzert et al (2019) data driven models (such as machine learning) have proven to be even better than the physical, conceptual models in flood forecasting studies.…”
Section: Data Driven Model/machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [42][43][44] SVR Its increased generalisation ability, unique and globally optimum structures, and ability to be quickly trained. And SVR's flexibility is one of its strongest features, dependent on several types of kernel functions such as linear, polynomial, and radial basis function (RBF) kernels.…”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roy and Singh [11] developed a novel hybrid metaheuristic method for simulating the rainfall-runoff process that integrates Biogeography-Based Optimization (BBO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) combining ANN and Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). Moreover, three optimization algorithms integrated with ANFIS were introduced for rainfall-runoff predictions, namely, Differential Evolution algorithm based ANFIS (ANFIS-DE), Particle Swarm Optimization based ANFIS (ANFIS-PSO), and Genetic Algorithm based ANFIS (ANFIS-GA) [53]. Investigating and contrasting these models in hydrology is strongly advised because the different algorithms have various advantages and VOLUME 11, 2023 distinct methods for complex modelling phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%