2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revised gyro-age for M67 fromKepler/K2-Campaign-5light curves

Abstract: We revisit the photometric variability of stars in the M 67 field using Kepler/K2-Campaign-5 light curves. In our previous work, we limited the search area around M 67 to that of a recent ground-based study. In the present work, we expand the search area and apply a more rigorous period-finding algorithm to determine the rotation periods of 98 main sequence cluster members from the same data. In addition, we derive periods of 40 stars from the K2SC detrended light curves. We determine the mean period of single… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimate the grass level in this frequency region to be less than ∼15 µmag, which underlines the high quality of the K2 data, which, at least in the case of the analyzed data set, are comparable in this respect to data from the original Kepler mission. Note, though, that the noise level increases significantly towards lower frequencies, which substantiates the above mentioned results of Douglas et al (2016) and Gonzalez (2016).…”
Section: Period Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimate the grass level in this frequency region to be less than ∼15 µmag, which underlines the high quality of the K2 data, which, at least in the case of the analyzed data set, are comparable in this respect to data from the original Kepler mission. Note, though, that the noise level increases significantly towards lower frequencies, which substantiates the above mentioned results of Douglas et al (2016) and Gonzalez (2016).…”
Section: Period Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The presence of significant low-frequency power in K2 data, which is unrelated to intrinsic stellar variability, has been established (e.g. Douglas et al 2016;Gonzalez 2016). Bearing in mind the time baseline of only ∼79 days, we are therefore inclined to regard these frequencies as spurious detections.…”
Section: Period Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One possibility is to use rotation measurements from K2 observations of the ∼4.0 Gyr cluster M67. However, inconsistent results for the rotation distribution in this cluster have been found (Barnes et al 2016;Gonzalez 2016a;Gonzalez 2016b), andEsselstein et al (2018) showed that accurately determining the rotation periods from the available data is challenging, especially given their long 20-35 day rotation periods and the limited 75 day observation window. Another problem with using M67 is that the age of the cluster is uncertain, and many age determinations are based on the gyrochonology method, which for our purpose is not useful.…”
Section: Observational Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample, presented in Table 1, was chosen from a list built with M67 objects that have high membership probabilities, calculated using proper motion from Yadav et al (2008), previous spectroscopic studies by Pasquini et al (2008), and further studies of radial velocity by Geller et al (2015). Furthermore, we verified objects that may have about 1M ⊙ and some photometric modulation from Kepler K2, as analysed by Barnes et al (2016) and Gonzalez (2016).…”
Section: Sample and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%