2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2013.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revised metric for quantifying body shape in vertebrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most posterior vertebrae within fishes are the caudal vertebrae and feature both hemal and neural arches ( Fig. 1a; Collar et al, 2013). While the types of vertebrae present across fishes are consistent, actual vertebral number varies greatly (Ward and Brainerd, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most posterior vertebrae within fishes are the caudal vertebrae and feature both hemal and neural arches ( Fig. 1a; Collar et al, 2013). While the types of vertebrae present across fishes are consistent, actual vertebral number varies greatly (Ward and Brainerd, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and, more generally, on vertebrate morphology (Collar et al. ). These similarities suggest that EFT can describe both quantitatively and objectively the known morphological features and reveal more subtle components of morphological diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More probable is that changes in opercular shape reflect behavioural differences such as an increased importance of the opercular pump in gill ventilation relative to passive ram ventilation, or changes in body shape. We calculated Felsenstein's contrasts correlation (after Felsenstein, ) using the PDAP module (Midford, Garland & Maddison, ) in Mesquite (Maddison & Maddison, ) to examine the relationship between the depth : length ratio of the operculum and the fineness ratio (Collar et al ., ), a measure of axial elongation, in saurichthyids. Birgeria was excluded, as operculum morphology is not closely comparable to saurichthyids, and homology issues exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fork length was measured from the most anterior point on the fish to the most posterior point along the axial midline. The fineness ratio, a measure of axial elongation in saurichthyids, is defined as length divided by the maximum depth of the body as preserved (Collar et al ., ). Descriptions pertain to the holotype specimen unless explicitly noted to avoid confusion if the referred material is later reassigned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%