2006
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revised model for spermatogonial expansion in man: lessons from non-human primates

Abstract: We have recently described a revised scheme for spermatogonial expansion in non-human primates. We proposed that A palespermatogonia act as self-renewing progenitors and premeiotic germ cells are organized and divide as small clones. Here, we are revisiting the model described for man and propose a modified scheme for spermatogonial expansion. Our revised model shows high similarity to the scheme proposed for non-human primates and is in accordance with all previous and present data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The full time course of the pubertal increase in undifferentiated spermatogonial number remains to be determined because a late pubertal group was not included in this study. Considerable controversy surrounds the issue of the mitotic behavior of Ad dark spermatogonia (Ehmcke & Schlatt 2006, Hermann et al 2010, Plant 2010. In the adult, classic studies on the monkey testis conducted in the 1960s led Clermont (1972) to propose that these cells very rarely divide and he therefore tentatively termed them reserve stem cells.…”
Section: Late Juvenilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full time course of the pubertal increase in undifferentiated spermatogonial number remains to be determined because a late pubertal group was not included in this study. Considerable controversy surrounds the issue of the mitotic behavior of Ad dark spermatogonia (Ehmcke & Schlatt 2006, Hermann et al 2010, Plant 2010. In the adult, classic studies on the monkey testis conducted in the 1960s led Clermont (1972) to propose that these cells very rarely divide and he therefore tentatively termed them reserve stem cells.…”
Section: Late Juvenilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clermont (1972) claimed that the Ad and Ap spermatogonia represent 'reserve' and 'active' stem cells respectively. Others proposed that the low mitotic index of the Ad spermatogonia is indicative of a 'true' stem cell phenotype (for review, see Dadoune (2007)) while the regularly dividing Ap spermatogonia may represent 'renewing progenitors' (compare Ehmcke & Schlatt (2006)). Different from these suggestions, a study in the rhesus monkey indicated that the Ad and Ap nuclear phenotypes of primate spermatogonia may rather correlate with different stages of the cell cycle (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for these possibilities to be realised, new differentiation protocols will have to be developed and ways found to prevent the formation of teratomas. In addition, spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in primates differ from those in non-primate mammals and are not yet fully understood (de Rooij and Russell, 2000;Ehmcke and Schlatt, 2006). Human SSCs might be different in nature and might be regulated in different ways, and they might also have different levels of susceptibility to making the transition to an ES-like cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%