2011
DOI: 10.1600/036364411x605074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Revision of Solanum Section Herpystichum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seithe (1962) classified Solanum using hair types and defined a group “chorus subgenerum Solanum ” as those species with simple or branched trichomes; within that taxon she followed Bitter (1917) in segregating subgenus Lyciosolanum from subgenus Solanum , and in maintaining all of Bitter’s sections. She placed these in a group of vining plants with sections Dulcamara (Dunal) Bitter (Dulcamaroid clade, Knapp 2013), Jasminosolanum Seithe (Dulcamaroid clade, Knapp 2013), Aculeigerum Seithe (Wendlandii+Allophyllum group, see Clark et al 2015) and Herpystichum Bitter (Potato clade, see Tepe and Bohs 2011). Danert (1970) also suggested a close relationship between sections Dulcamara , Jasminosolanum and Aculeigerum (equivalent in part to the Wendlandii/Allophyllum clade of Bohs 2005) and members of the ANS clade based on a shared vining habit.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of the African Non-spiny (Ans) Cladementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seithe (1962) classified Solanum using hair types and defined a group “chorus subgenerum Solanum ” as those species with simple or branched trichomes; within that taxon she followed Bitter (1917) in segregating subgenus Lyciosolanum from subgenus Solanum , and in maintaining all of Bitter’s sections. She placed these in a group of vining plants with sections Dulcamara (Dunal) Bitter (Dulcamaroid clade, Knapp 2013), Jasminosolanum Seithe (Dulcamaroid clade, Knapp 2013), Aculeigerum Seithe (Wendlandii+Allophyllum group, see Clark et al 2015) and Herpystichum Bitter (Potato clade, see Tepe and Bohs 2011). Danert (1970) also suggested a close relationship between sections Dulcamara , Jasminosolanum and Aculeigerum (equivalent in part to the Wendlandii/Allophyllum clade of Bohs 2005) and members of the ANS clade based on a shared vining habit.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of the African Non-spiny (Ans) Cladementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large size of Solanum and its poorly understood infrageneric structure has meant that Solanum taxonomy has proceeded in a piecemeal fashion until relatively recently and the genus has acquired a reputation of being intractable. A project funded by the United States National Science Foundation’s Planetary Biodiversity Inventory (PBI) program begun in 2004 has sought to accelerate species-level taxonomic work across the genus and has resulted in a series of monographic and phylogenetic treatments from both Old and New Worlds (e.g., Tepe and Bohs 2011; Stern et al 2013; Knapp 2013; Clark et al 2015; Wahlert et al 2015; Aubriot et al 2016; Vorontsova and Knapp 2016). An electronic monographic treatment of the entire genus is begin made available online in the web resource Solanaceae Source (http://www.solanaceaesource.org).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that work, I repeated Michel Felix Dunal’s attribution of the type collection of Solanumtrifolium Dunal, a species endemic to the central Andes of Ecuador, to Ruiz and Pavón (Tepe and Bohs 2011). Ruiz and Pavón, however, never collected in Ecuador and, in fact, by the time that collection was made in August 1804, the pair had already been back in Spain for over six years (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The following is a correction of a previously published revision of Solanumsect.Herpystichum (Tepe and Bohs 2011) and a historical note intended to help future authors avoid making the same mistake. In that work, I repeated Michel Felix Dunal’s attribution of the type collection of Solanumtrifolium Dunal, a species endemic to the central Andes of Ecuador, to Ruiz and Pavón (Tepe and Bohs 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation