2014
DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2014.936915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revision of the Pennsylvanian marattialean fernLobatopteris vestita auct. and related species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analogous situation has been recently reported of a frond fragment from the upper Westphalian of the Zwickau Coalfield (Germany) that superficially resembles Lobatopteris but which appears to have ovules attached (Krings & Schultka, ). Although Wagner () diagnosed Lobatopteris exclusively on morphological characters of the pinnules, he clearly regarded it as a (fossil‐)genus of marattialean fronds (see also Cleal, ; Wittry et al, ). The presence of attached ovules therefore makes its systematic position in Lobatopteris problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An analogous situation has been recently reported of a frond fragment from the upper Westphalian of the Zwickau Coalfield (Germany) that superficially resembles Lobatopteris but which appears to have ovules attached (Krings & Schultka, ). Although Wagner () diagnosed Lobatopteris exclusively on morphological characters of the pinnules, he clearly regarded it as a (fossil‐)genus of marattialean fronds (see also Cleal, ; Wittry et al, ). The presence of attached ovules therefore makes its systematic position in Lobatopteris problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that this was due to a Lazarus effect (sensu Flessa & Jablonski, 1983 (Krings & Schultka, 2010). Although Wagner (1959b) diagnosed Lobatopteris exclusively on morphological characters of the pinnules, he clearly regarded it as a (fossil-)genus of marattialean fronds (see also Cleal, 2015;Wittry et al, 2014). The presence of attached ovules therefore makes its systematic position in Lobatopteris problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wagner, 1958-Crenulopteris Wittry et al, 2014 Four slab faces contain small and poorly preserved fragments of a fern of the Lobatopteris -Crenulopteris complex (cf. Wittry et al, 2014). The terminal (Plate I,3) and more proximal (Plate I, 2) part of a single pinna are illustrated, as is a lobate pinnule (or distal ultimate pinna) of another specimen (Plate I,8).…”
Section: Sphenopsidsmentioning
confidence: 99%