2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Revisit of Sparse Coding Based Anomaly Detection in Stacked RNN Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
570
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 708 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
570
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao et al [44] proposed to use 3D convolution based reconstruction and prediction. Luo et al [24] iteratively update the sparse coefficients via a stacked RNN to detect anomalies in videos. Liu et al [22] train a frame prediction network by incorporating different techniques including gradient loss, optical flow, and adversarial training.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhao et al [44] proposed to use 3D convolution based reconstruction and prediction. Luo et al [24] iteratively update the sparse coefficients via a stacked RNN to detect anomalies in videos. Liu et al [22] train a frame prediction network by incorporating different techniques including gradient loss, optical flow, and adversarial training.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AE-Conv2D [9] 0.850 0.800 0.609 AE-Conv3D [44] 0.912 0.771 -TSC [24] 0.910 0.806 0.679 StackRNN [24] 0…”
Section: Experiments On Video Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For verification of the general applicability of our model, we carry out extensive experiments with two types of mainstream action classifiers: a 3D-conv network C3D [59] and a two-stream structure TSN [62]. In addition, we evaluate the proposed approach on 3 different-scale datasets, i.e., UCF-Crime [58], ShanghaiTech [43] and UCSD-Peds [35]. The experimental results demonstrate that our model advances the state-of-the-art performance of weakly supervised anomaly detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback is the high computational cost in finding combination coefficients due to sparse representation. Some studies thus attempt to reduce the complexity by modifying the learning algorithms and/or data structures [26,28]. Beside window-based split, 3D patches are also determined using keypoint detectors [5] while other researchers attempt to learn the relation between training patches according to their distribution [30] or graph-based representation [20].…”
Section: Sparse Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ped2 Conv-AE [11] 0.702 0.900 Discriminative learning [7] 0.783 -Hashing filters [54] -0.910 Unmask late fusion [16] 0.806 0.822 AMDN (double fusion) [51] -0.908 ConvLSTM-AE [27] 0.770 0.881 DeepAppearance [42] 0.846 -FRCN action [14] -0.922 TSC [28] 0.806 0.910 Stacked RNN [28] 0.817 0.922 AbnormalGAN [37] -0.935 GrowingGas [46] -0.941 Future frame prediction [25] 0.851 0.954 Our proposed method 0.869 0.962 Table 1. Frame-level performance (AUC) of anomaly detection on the CUHK Avenue and UCSD Ped2 datasets.…”
Section: Avenuementioning
confidence: 99%