2011 International Conference on Computer Vision 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revisit to cost aggregation in stereo matching: How far can we reduce its computational redundancy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, those methods are limited in that they do not scale to extremely large label sets. To overcome this problem, with regard to stereo matching, Min et al [26,27] proposed a technique to estimate a compact disparity subset for every pixel by considering disparities with the local minima of the pre-filtered cost values. Although this method efficiently achieves high-quality results with the Middlebury stereo benchmark [25], it cannot be applied to general multi-labeling problems directly.…”
Section: Cost Aggregation Methods For Labeling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, those methods are limited in that they do not scale to extremely large label sets. To overcome this problem, with regard to stereo matching, Min et al [26,27] proposed a technique to estimate a compact disparity subset for every pixel by considering disparities with the local minima of the pre-filtered cost values. Although this method efficiently achieves high-quality results with the Middlebury stereo benchmark [25], it cannot be applied to general multi-labeling problems directly.…”
Section: Cost Aggregation Methods For Labeling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Min et al [20] reduced the search range using a subset of informative disparity hypotheses. However, this method cannot get precise results at depth discontinuities as the aggregation windows located on depth edges represent pixels from different depths.…”
Section: : Refines Disparity B : Aggregates Cost a : Computes Matchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Equation 2 becomes the multi-window method [5], the adaptive window method [6], and the adaptive weight method [7] according to the weight function w(x, y) and/or the neighborhood N . Thus, in conventional methods, the number of iteration should be specified in advance and it significantly influences the performance of algorithms [7,9,10,11,12]. Recently, the RWR has become increasingly popular, since its restarting term gives the meaningful information in a steady-state, allowing it to consider the global relation at all scales [19].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, De-Maeztu and Villanueva presented a diffusion-based correspondence matching in which the computed weights as well as the costs were diffused so as to lower the computational cost [13]. While most methods have concentrated on reducing the image resolution and on modifying the window size and/or the shape, Min et al accelerated the matching speed by compressing a search range space and sampling points in the matching window [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation