2018
DOI: 10.3233/jvr-180954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revisited inquiry: A survey of the members of the American Rehabilitation Counseling Association (ARCA)

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:In recognition of the American Rehabilitation Counseling Association's (ARCA) 60th anniversary and the need to gather and provide data to further inform the Rehabilitation Counseling (RC) field with recent developments, a replication of the Peterson, Hautamaki, and Hershenson (2006) study that included surveying ARCA members at the time as well as similar studies in the field (Trotter & Kozochowicz, 1970) was completed. METHODS: Similar questions related to overall membership benefits, motivations, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two representative professional bodies, while maintaining strict standards for membership, view rehabilitation counseling from different perspectives; one as a standalone profession, the other as a specialty of counseling (Barnes, Rak, Austin, & Louw, 2012;Patterson, 2009). The presence of different perspectives has fragmented rehabilitation counselors' views about the identity of the profession and its body of knowledge (Huber, Walker, Dunlap, Russell, & Richardson, 2019;Stebnicki, 2009). Pressures for the two bodies to merge, initially voiced in 1989, continued until 2017 when the merger was actualized to strengthen the profession and unify the professional education accreditation process (Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Programs (CACREP), 2019).…”
Section: Identifiable Body Of Knowledge and Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two representative professional bodies, while maintaining strict standards for membership, view rehabilitation counseling from different perspectives; one as a standalone profession, the other as a specialty of counseling (Barnes, Rak, Austin, & Louw, 2012;Patterson, 2009). The presence of different perspectives has fragmented rehabilitation counselors' views about the identity of the profession and its body of knowledge (Huber, Walker, Dunlap, Russell, & Richardson, 2019;Stebnicki, 2009). Pressures for the two bodies to merge, initially voiced in 1989, continued until 2017 when the merger was actualized to strengthen the profession and unify the professional education accreditation process (Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Programs (CACREP), 2019).…”
Section: Identifiable Body Of Knowledge and Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…given the continuing conflicting perspectives of the professional bodies in Australia. Such schisms have the potential to negatively impact the standing of the profession in the minds of its members (Huber et. al, 2019) and of rehabilitation counseling in the mind of the community.…”
Section: Further Development Of the Evidence Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCB has been rated by members in the past two ARCA surveys as the No. 1 membership benefit (Huber, Walker, Dunlap, Russell, & Richardson, 2019;Peterson, Hautamaki, & Hershenson, 2006). Excellent historical reviews of ARCA's organizational and ideological development are available in the literature (e.g., DiMichael & Thomas, 1985;Peterson et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%