2020
DOI: 10.1177/1729881420940651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reward–punishment feedback control strategy based on energy information for wrist rehabilitation

Abstract: Based on evidence from the previous research in rehabilitation robot control strategies, we found that the common feature of the effective control strategies to promote subjects’ engagement is creating a reward–punishment feedback mechanism. This article proposes a reward–punishment feedback control strategy based on energy information. Firstly, an engagement estimated approach based on energy information is developed to evaluate subjects’ performance. Secondly, the estimated result forms a reward–punishment t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rehabilitation doctor observes the actual action and the model action displayed by the mobile terminal when the patient uses the device. The evaluation conclusions are as follows: ① The model action has a high degree of reduction relative to the actual action of the patient, and the action is accurate and continuous, which can replace manual monitoring, and does not use cameras, and does not infringe on the privacy of the patient; ② the range of motion displayed by the motion reconstruction app is within 5 °of the manual measured value, meeting the needs of rehabilitation medicine for motor function evaluation and training guidance; and ③ the system delay is less than 0.5 s, which has good real-time performance and can respond quickly to emergencies, ensuring the safety of patients' out-of-hospital rehabilitation [25].…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The rehabilitation doctor observes the actual action and the model action displayed by the mobile terminal when the patient uses the device. The evaluation conclusions are as follows: ① The model action has a high degree of reduction relative to the actual action of the patient, and the action is accurate and continuous, which can replace manual monitoring, and does not use cameras, and does not infringe on the privacy of the patient; ② the range of motion displayed by the motion reconstruction app is within 5 °of the manual measured value, meeting the needs of rehabilitation medicine for motor function evaluation and training guidance; and ③ the system delay is less than 0.5 s, which has good real-time performance and can respond quickly to emergencies, ensuring the safety of patients' out-of-hospital rehabilitation [25].…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall, these results show that rewards and punishments enhance performance by increasing ICF and decreasing SICI during movement preparation only. One implication is that targeting M1's GLUTergic and GABAA signalling movement preparationbut not feedback processingprocesses using pharmacological and/or non-invasive brain stimulation interventions can further enhance the neurorehabilitative potential of rewards in clinical settings [15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Incentives Did Not Alter Icf or Sici During Feedback Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, changes in CSE reflect the excitability of cortical, subcortical, as well as spinal structures 12 , which can further reflect an increase in glutamatergic (GLUTergic) and/or a decrease in gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic activity 13,14 . Importantly, rewards and punishments are increasingly recognised as potential enhancers of rehabilitation following physical and brain insults [15][16][17][18] . Therefore, elucidating their mechanisms of action could lead to improved therapeutic interventions 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of patients' function abilities is predominantly categorized into two main approaches: the biomechanical model-based method [7,8] and the motor performance-based method [7,[10][11][12][13]. In the context of biomechanical modeling, a skeletal muscle model is usually constructed and analyzed using biomechanical theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%