2015
DOI: 10.1109/mitp.2015.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Right to Cybercounter Strikes: The Risks of Legalizing Hack Backs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the public discourse, the Second Amendment and the Castle Doctrine tend to part of the same discussion. The Castle Doctrine has also been used as an argument to support legalization of corporate hack back [16].…”
Section: The Castle Doctrinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the public discourse, the Second Amendment and the Castle Doctrine tend to part of the same discussion. The Castle Doctrine has also been used as an argument to support legalization of corporate hack back [16].…”
Section: The Castle Doctrinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…taking a much stronger approach than simply defending oneself by performing offensive cyber operations on the perpetrators of these attacks. Discussions about such a potential "hack back" strategy have been increasing in the private sector since the wave of cyber espionage surrounding the development of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II fighter jet (Kallberg, 2015). The concept has also gained prominence due to the actions of the United States Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) targeting the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) prior to the a cost on the attackers, defenders render the option of the cyber-attack much less attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%