2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A right visual field advantage for tool-recognition in the visual half-field paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reaction Times and Accuracy were calculated based on the first key-press registered. Reaction time measurement started from stimulus offset, like in Verma and Brysbaert (2011). This means that 200 ms must be added to get the total processing time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Reaction Times and Accuracy were calculated based on the first key-press registered. Reaction time measurement started from stimulus offset, like in Verma and Brysbaert (2011). This means that 200 ms must be added to get the total processing time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from a vast array of clinical and neuroimaging research the hemispheric dominance for tool use has also been examined in behavioral studies. Verma & Brysbaert (2011) used the visual half-field (VHF) paradigm, in which stimuli are presented to the left and to the right of the fixation point and participants have to respond to the stimuli. The authors found that while there was no visual field difference for object recognition, a significant right visual field (RVF) advantage was observed for tools in the tool recognition task, in line with the left hemisphere dominance for tool processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations