AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-1898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rigid Mid Lift-to-Drag Ratio Approach to Human Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing

Abstract: Current NASA Human Mars architectures require delivery of approximately 20 metric tons of cargo to the surface in a single landing. A proposed vehicle type for performing the entry, descent, and landing at Mars associated with this architecture is a rigid, enclosed, elongated lifting body shape that provides a higher lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) than a typical entry capsule, but lower than a typical winged entry vehicle (such as the Space Shuttle Orbiter). A rigid Mid-L/D shape has advantages for large mass Mars E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous 3-DOF trajectories utilized perfect control, but there was no way to simulate an RCS thrust acceleration 3 Because of this, a pseudo-1-DOF controller that emulates an applied bank acceleration and rate limit was created. Monte Carlo dispersions on angular accelerations and rate limits influenced RCS jet design and requirements.…”
Section: Control System Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous 3-DOF trajectories utilized perfect control, but there was no way to simulate an RCS thrust acceleration 3 Because of this, a pseudo-1-DOF controller that emulates an applied bank acceleration and rate limit was created. Monte Carlo dispersions on angular accelerations and rate limits influenced RCS jet design and requirements.…”
Section: Control System Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerodynamic moment coefficients for the Mid-L/D were generated at various angles of attack ( ) and sideslip angles ( ) from Mach 12 to 2 using the Cart3D CFD analysis tool. 3 The moment is transferred from the aerodynamic moment reference center (MRC) at the nose and applied to the CG as shown in Figure 5. …”
Section: Natural Aerodynamic Static Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%