2009
DOI: 10.1142/s0129055x09003797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rigorous Treatment of the Perturbation Theory for Many-Electron Systems

Abstract: Four point correlation functions for many electrons at finite temperature in periodic lattice of dimension d (≥ 1) are analyzed by the perturbation theory with respect to the coupling constant. The correlation functions are characterized as a limit of finite dimensional Grassmann integrals. A lower bound on the radius of convergence and an upper bound on the perturbation series are obtained by evaluating the Taylor expansion of logarithm of the finite dimensional Grassmann Gaussian integrals. The perturbation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For anyX m j ∈Ĩ m j L,h (j = 1, · · · , n), T ∈ T n , ξ ∈ S n (T ), s ∈ [0, 1] n−1 and l ∈ {N β , · · · , N h }, e n q,r=1 Mat(T,ξ,s)q,r∆q,r(C l (wep)) This can be proved by using (4.11) and the properties of M at (T, ξ, s) and by repeating the same argument as in[10, Lemma 4.5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For anyX m j ∈Ĩ m j L,h (j = 1, · · · , n), T ∈ T n , ξ ∈ S n (T ), s ∈ [0, 1] n−1 and l ∈ {N β , · · · , N h }, e n q,r=1 Mat(T,ξ,s)q,r∆q,r(C l (wep)) This can be proved by using (4.11) and the properties of M at (T, ξ, s) and by repeating the same argument as in[10, Lemma 4.5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this section we formulate the correlation function by using the notion of Grassmann integral and show that the Grassmann integral representation of the correlation function multiplied by the distance between the holes and the electrons is transformed into a contour integral of the Grassmann integral. This procedure is essentially the same as we did in [10], [11]. In order to avoid unnecessary repetition we present the proofs at a minimum.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the tree expansion presented above overcounts the combinatorial factor, which is defined as the number of monomials appearing in the expansion {p,q}∈T (∆ p,q + ∆ q,p ) · (the monomial (4.7)). If we consider the 4 point correlation functions for the on-site interaction V = U x∈Γ ψ * x↑ ψ * x↓ ψ x↓ ψ x↑ (U ∈ R), the exact calculation of the combinatorial factor without overcounting is possible as proved in [7,Lemma 4.7]. Consequently, the perturbative bound is improved in this case.…”
Section: Are Vectors Of the Grassmann Left Derivatives Corresponding mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show (iv), define an h-dependent finite set M h of Matsubara frequencies by Using the assumption that h ∈ 2N/β, the argument parallel to [7,Appendix C] demonstrates that…”
Section: Exponential Decay Of the Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation