2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00082.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rigorous yet simple quantitative risk assessment method for quarantine pests and non‐native organisms

Abstract: Internationally recognised guidelines for the assessment of risk posed by nonnative organisms generally suggest that the assessment is disaggregated into a series of components each being scored and then the scores added or averaged to give the final result. Assigning odds instead of scores allows a more rigorous probabilistic treatment of the data, which can offer more effective discrimination between organisms. For each component of the assessment, the odds express how likely is the evidence if the organism … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the OIE provides a scale to classify and standardize qualitative probability categories [15]. National agencies in Australia (Biosecurity Australia), Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) and the USA (United States Department of Agriculture) have used numerical ordinal scales that correspond to verbal expressions of risk for their qualitative risk assessments [59]. For example, very low, low, …, high is equivalent to 1, 2, …, n , where n is the number of points on the scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the OIE provides a scale to classify and standardize qualitative probability categories [15]. National agencies in Australia (Biosecurity Australia), Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) and the USA (United States Department of Agriculture) have used numerical ordinal scales that correspond to verbal expressions of risk for their qualitative risk assessments [59]. For example, very low, low, …, high is equivalent to 1, 2, …, n , where n is the number of points on the scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean, then again, favors intermediate scores ( Fig. A2; Holt et al 2006, but see Hughes 2008. Our set of suggested operations therefore reflects a trade-off between the use of the precautionary principle, discriminative power and flexibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a disciplined process that is used to predict whether or not a species is likely to become established and be invasive and to generate a relative ranking of risk (Wittenberg and Cock, 2001). Usually, scores are assigned to each of the risk components and then the scores are added or averaged to give the final result, or odds may be assigned instead of scores (Holt et al, 2006). Entire pathways may also be analysed for risk.…”
Section: Assessing Risk and Selecting Target Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%