2016
DOI: 10.4236/ojem.2016.43008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Risk-Adjusted Retrospective Data Analysis between Younger and Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes—Long-Term Prognosis

Abstract: Purpose: To compare the demographic data and outcomes of younger versus elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes. Methods: This was a retrospective data bank analysis study with 966 patients (268 in the younger group (less than 55 years) and 698 in the elderly group (more than 55 years)). Data were obtained about clinical characteristics, angiography, and medication used at hospital and coronary definitive treatment. The primary endpoint was all cause of in-hospital death and combined events. Comparison … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The following factors in our study were risk factors for complications and/or hospital death: a cardiovascular risk factor number superior to 2 (p = 0.026), admission blood glucose upper to 1.24 g/l (OR = 6.19 [1.21 -31.72]), a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% (OR = 5.93 [1.30 -27.01]), a charge superior to 12 h (p = 0.000; OR = 4.99 [1.24 -19.92]). Age was not a factor of poor prognosis in our study, unlike the results of De Matos Soeiro in which, in patients with acute coronary syndromes, age was an important predictor of mortality and complications [17].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The following factors in our study were risk factors for complications and/or hospital death: a cardiovascular risk factor number superior to 2 (p = 0.026), admission blood glucose upper to 1.24 g/l (OR = 6.19 [1.21 -31.72]), a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% (OR = 5.93 [1.30 -27.01]), a charge superior to 12 h (p = 0.000; OR = 4.99 [1.24 -19.92]). Age was not a factor of poor prognosis in our study, unlike the results of De Matos Soeiro in which, in patients with acute coronary syndromes, age was an important predictor of mortality and complications [17].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%