A Risk Analysis and Ranking Application for Lifting Vehicles Used in Construction Sites with Integrated AHP and Fine-Kinney Approach

Abstract

Risk scoring methods applied in risk assessments used in Turkey, differ from each other in terms of analysis methods, scoring the risks, presumption and sensitivity levels. This article aims to eliminate the effects of divergent results of different risk analyses of lifting equipments used in the building industry and develop a practical hybrid risk analysis and ranking method. In this study risks of lifting equipments used in the building industry were scored by conventional Fine-Kenney risk analysis method first. Secondly, with the experience of previous accidents on construction sites, the reasons of accidents were sorted into 7 main criteria, which being 'Demographic', 'Behavioral', 'Machine Related', 'Working Environment Related', 'Economical', 'Administrative' and 'Organizational' criteria and related sub-criteria. Developing these criteria was supported by the experience of inspections carried out by labour inspectors. The weighted scores of these criteria were calculated by AHP method using a questionnaire applied to 14 experienced labor inspectors. The weighted scores obtained by the analytical hierarchy process method (AHP) were multiplied by the scores obtained by Fine-Kinney risk assessment method and a new integrated risk assessment and ranking application was introduced. With this application, a different priority rank was created and which risk to be eliminated primarily was determined.

Work Accident Risk at Hospital Construction Environment

“…2017). Fine method provides a more detailed explanation of the concepts of exposure, consequence and probability (Yilmaz et al 2019). Where Fine exposure is the frequency of exposure to a hazard or a source of risk .…”

Risk assessment of firefighting job using hybrid SWARA-ARAS methods in fuzzy environment

“…The causes of accidents were divided into seven primary categories based on prior occurrence records, and the weighted scores of these criteria were determined using the AHP method. The AHP weighted ratings were then multiplied by the Fine-Kinney scores, and the resulting values were used to prioritize specific hazards [ 17 ].…”

A New Approach to the Fine Kinney Method with AHP Based ELECTRE I and Math Model on Risk Assessment for Natural Disasters

“…The regional risk of natural disasters is a critical MCDM problem in the literature due to the complicated and usually conflicting evaluation index system (Chen et al, 2019). Yilmaz and Ozcan (2019) propose that the AHP method is one of the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods used for risk. There are many different studies related to risk using the AHP method (Ganguly andGuin, 2013, Mabrouki et al, 2014;Dagsuyu et al, 2021).…”