2015
DOI: 10.5558/tfc2015-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk analysis framework for forest pest management

Abstract: A risk analysis framework comprised of assessment, response and communication elements is discussed in the context of forest pest management in Canada. Despite many shared pests and common issues in resource management, capacity in forest pest management varies greatly by jurisdictions depending on historical, socio-economic and cultural expectations. Research and operational expertise is separated among jurisdictions as is responsibility for native and alien pests. A risk analysis framework provides a structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the lack of hard economic data to define precise cost/benefit thresholds, many concepts of IPM were incorporated into the management of forest pests and helped guide management actions and IPM systems in Canada (Nealis 2015). These systems all favoured damage prevention or outbreak risk reduction as a starting point.…”
Section: Changing Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the lack of hard economic data to define precise cost/benefit thresholds, many concepts of IPM were incorporated into the management of forest pests and helped guide management actions and IPM systems in Canada (Nealis 2015). These systems all favoured damage prevention or outbreak risk reduction as a starting point.…”
Section: Changing Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, studies have not focused on private forest owners as an important stakeholder in forest pest management, even though the responsibility for pest management normally falls on forest owners [31]. Furthermore, in Slovenia, close-to-nature management is practiced in a large part of the forest area, and guidelines for increasing tree diversity throughout the territory have been in place since the end of WWII [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%