2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk assessment framework of PPP waste-to-energy incineration projects in China under 2-dimension linguistic environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
58
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have been conducted of the risk identification of PPP WTE incineration projects in China using literature reviews, case studies, questionnaire surveys, etc Consistent with previous findings, a range of risk factors, such as public opposition risk, environmental risk, and government decision‐making risk, in PPP WTE incineration projects has achieved the consensus of previous findings. However, the differences in the identified risk factors lie in the following four aspects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies have been conducted of the risk identification of PPP WTE incineration projects in China using literature reviews, case studies, questionnaire surveys, etc Consistent with previous findings, a range of risk factors, such as public opposition risk, environmental risk, and government decision‐making risk, in PPP WTE incineration projects has achieved the consensus of previous findings. However, the differences in the identified risk factors lie in the following four aspects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Liu et al identified 18 risk factors of 35 PPP WTE incineration plants using content analysis and expert interviews and classified them into three categories: high frequency, medium frequency, and low frequency. Wu et al quantitatively selected 14 critical risk factors from 12 incineration plants and then presented a risk assessment framework by combining two‐dimensional linguistic information with a cloud model. Combining experts' judgments (84 experts) and historical data (22 cases), Wang and Zhang adopted a Bayesian analytic approach to forecast risk occurrence probability, and 7 critical risk factors were identified.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many MCDM techniques, which can utilized in different decision-making problem including TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), DEMATEL (decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory), AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), GRA (Grey Relation Analysis), Distance measures, TOPSIS, VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje), PROMETHEE (Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation), ELECTRE (elimination and choice expressing reality), and BWM (Best-worst method).. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Therefore, scientifically expressing decision-making problems and funding mathematic-based techniques to improve the viability of prioritizing alternatives is vital. [39][40][41] Some engineering applications have been done by many scholars as follows. Thus, subjectivity needs to be handled in a realistic case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al [11] applied a standard risk-analysis model of NPV-at-risk tool supported by Monte Carlo Simulation to the real-world PPP based highway infrastructure projects, which is able to identify which source of uncertainty has the most influence on the project's financial returns and what is the actual relationship between the critical influencing parameters and associated NPV. Wu et al [12] combined the 2-dimension linguistic information of fuzziness and randomness with the cloud model to put forward a risk assessment framework of PPP waste-to-energy incineration projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%