2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk scoring tool for predicting Kenyan women at high risk of contraceptive discontinuation

Abstract: Objective We developed and validated a pragmatic risk assessment tool for identifying contraceptive discontinuation among Kenyan women who do not desire pregnancy. Study design Within a prospective cohort of contraceptive users, participants were randomly allocated to derivation ( n = 558) and validation ( n = 186) cohorts. Risk scores were developed by selecting the Cox proportional hazards model with the minimum Ak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women who were initiating, continuing or switching a modern contraceptive method were eligible. Study methods have been described previously 22 . We restricted our analysis to participants using injectables, implants, intrauterine devices or systems (IUD/IUS) and daily oral contraceptive pills (OCP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women who were initiating, continuing or switching a modern contraceptive method were eligible. Study methods have been described previously 22 . We restricted our analysis to participants using injectables, implants, intrauterine devices or systems (IUD/IUS) and daily oral contraceptive pills (OCP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study methods have been described previously. 22 We restricted our analysis to participants using injectables, implants, intrauterine devices or systems (IUD/IUS) and daily oral contraceptive pills (OCP). Women with missing (or not adequately specified) baseline contraceptive methods or who were lost to follow up after enrolment were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%