2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00815.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A riverscape perspective of Pacific salmonids and aquatic habitats prior to large‐scale dam removal in the Elwha River, Washington, USA

Abstract: Dam removal has been increasingly proposed as a river restoration technique. In 2011, two large hydroelectric dams will be removed from Washington State's Elwha River. Ten anadromous fish populations are expected to recolonise historical habitats after dam removal. A key to understanding watershed recolonisation is the collection of spatially continuous information on fish and aquatic habitats. A riverscape approach with an emphasis on biological data has rarely been applied in mid-sized, wilderness rivers, pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…abundance data were standardized as relative density (D r ) at both the unit and reach scales to account for variation in unit and bin length, and to reduce variance in the datasets (Brenkman et al 2012). At the unit scale, morphotype relative density was calculated for quantifying differences between habitat types:…”
Section: Data Standardizations and Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…abundance data were standardized as relative density (D r ) at both the unit and reach scales to account for variation in unit and bin length, and to reduce variance in the datasets (Brenkman et al 2012). At the unit scale, morphotype relative density was calculated for quantifying differences between habitat types:…”
Section: Data Standardizations and Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the reach scale, relative density was calculated in a similar fashion where f i = number fish per 1-km custom bin, l i =length (km) of custom bin, f t = total number of fish, and l t = total length (km) sampled. Positive and negative values of relative density indicated densities of mountain whitefish that were above and below the average density for the entire length of stream sampled, respectively (Brenkman et al 2012). Relative density was highly skewed (leptokurtic) at both the unit and reach scales, and therefore was transformed using the natural logarithm (x i + 1) for subsequent analysis (Zar 1984).…”
Section: Data Standardizations and Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olympic National Park is a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve (see Fig. 2) which brought more attention to how construction of the two dams had negatively impacted populations of salmon within the park (Brenkman et al 2012). Salmon, including chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (O. kisutch), pink (O. gorbuscha), chum (O. keta), and sockeye (O. nerka), and steelhead (O. mykiss) had all but disappeared because they lost access to approximately 95% of the watershed due to the construction of the dams.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become evident that genetic data can inform many decisions relating to management strategies, especially those that are aimed at maintaining abundance and genetic diversity in natural salmon populations (Olsen et al 2000;Eldridge and Killebrew 2007;Grandjean et al 2009;Brenkman et al 2012;Matala et al 2012). Without such information there is great risk of losing important life history variation that enables resilience of anadromous species to changing environments.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributing to evolution of these migratory patterns is their homing fidelity to natal spawning rivers that allow for reproductive isolation and development of unique evolutionary trajectories (Waples 2001;Quinn 2004). Anthropogenic activities including harvest, waterway development, hatchery production, and land use practices have altered salmon populations and their associated freshwater ecosystems; the result is often reduced life-history and genetic variability (Yoshiyama et al 1998;Brenkman et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%