A Roadmap for Personalized Care in Radiology

Kang, Stella K.; Fagerlin, Angela; Braithwaite, R. Scott

doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151187

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In personalized and precision medicine, imaging examinations must be able to provide specific information helping to achieve a definitive diagnosis, select the best treatment, and evaluate treatment response (1). Innovation in radiology involves the development of multidisciplinary teams to share knowledge and networking, integrating all the relevant scientific and technologic advances to provide expert guidance (2).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnetic resonance imaging structured reporting in infertility

Montoliu-Fornas

Martí‐Bonmatí

2016

Fertility and Sterility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our objective was to define and propose a standardized magnetic resonance (MR) imaging structured report in patients with infertility to have clinical completeness on possible diagnosis and severity. Patients should be studied preferable on 3T equipment with a surface coil. Standard MR protocol should include high-resolution fast spin-echo T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted images and gradient-echo T1-weighted fat suppression images. The report should include ovaries (polycystic, endometrioma, tumor), oviduct (hydrosalpinx, hematosalpinx, pyosalpinx, peritubal anomalies), uterus (agenesia, hypoplasia, unicornuate, uterus didelphys, bicornuate, septate uterus), myometrium (leiomyomas, adenomyosis), endometrium (polyps, synechia, atrophy, neoplasia), cervix and vagina (isthmoceles, mucosal-parietal irregularity, stenosis, neoplasia), peritoneum (deep endometriosis), and urinary system-associated abnormalities. To be clinically useful, radiology reports must be structured, use standardized terminology, and convey actionable information. The structured report must comprise complete, comprehensive, and accurate information, allowing radiologists to continuously interact with patients and referring physicians to confirm that the information is used properly to affect the decision making process.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnetic resonance imaging structured reporting in infertility

Montoliu-Fornas

Martí‐Bonmatí

2016

Fertility and Sterility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Incidental findings are commonly discovered on diagnostic imaging tests and associated with highly variable degrees of risk and non-uniform recommendations for additional tests and specialty consultations. Due to a high degree of uncertainty around the natural history of some lesions or clinical equipoise due to the overall low risk associated with some lesions, management decisions around many incidental findings justifiably incorporate patient preferences for shared decision-making (28). However, patients’ perception of such incidental findings and the influence of patient-centered risk communication techniques on risk comprehension and management preferences are understudied (3, 29).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests

Kang

Scherer

Megibow

et al. 2018

American Journal of Roentgenology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of multisource feedback for assessing clinical competencies has been further endorsed for its recognition that health care delivery is becoming increasingly interdisciplinary and team based and that this trend requires assessors from a variety of perspectives [11,15,22,24]. This is of substantial relevance to radiology, the value of which is becoming increasingly tied to its embeddedness within disparate health care system domains [25][26][27][28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%