2022
DOI: 10.1037/tra0001159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A roadmap for preventing and responding to trauma: Practical guidance for advancing community-engaged research.

Abstract: Objective: Community-engaged research (CEnR) is an approach to inquiry that centers scientist-community partnerships characterized by mutuality and reciprocity, and is well-aligned with trauma-informed principles, such as trustworthiness, transparency, and fostering empowerment. Method: The current paper considers definitions and applications of CEnR, highlighting examples from the trauma literature, from the formulation of research questions to the dissemination of research findings. Conclusion: To realize CE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers can contribute to these ongoing discussions and policymaking by conducting rigorous science on childhood adversity, including on the central role of caregivers and families in promoting resilience, by sharing their findings in meaningful ways with broad audiences that go beyond the academic realm. In this work it is essential that our field works to center the voices of youth and families affected by adversity and embraces community-engaged research approaches that directly involve affected youth and their caregivers throughout the research process (Collins et al, 2018; DePrince et al, 2022; Payán et al, 2022). Moreover, scholars in many other fields are conducting critical and complementary work; informing policy that prioritizes youth mental health will require interdisciplinary collaborations and partnerships.…”
Section: Implications For Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can contribute to these ongoing discussions and policymaking by conducting rigorous science on childhood adversity, including on the central role of caregivers and families in promoting resilience, by sharing their findings in meaningful ways with broad audiences that go beyond the academic realm. In this work it is essential that our field works to center the voices of youth and families affected by adversity and embraces community-engaged research approaches that directly involve affected youth and their caregivers throughout the research process (Collins et al, 2018; DePrince et al, 2022; Payán et al, 2022). Moreover, scholars in many other fields are conducting critical and complementary work; informing policy that prioritizes youth mental health will require interdisciplinary collaborations and partnerships.…”
Section: Implications For Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 provides an overview of the different actors in the network. Particularly in the treatment of trauma sequelae, cross-collaborations between, for example, practitioners, researchers, and advocacy groups have been shown to offer more benefits than the usual translation of science into clinical practice [ 33 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Establishing the Practitioner Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the historically exploitative relationships between research intensive universities and surrounding communities, often inhabited by minoritized and marginalized identity groups, reasonable skepticism about CES clinic services exists among community members (Gbadegesin & Wendler, 2006). While a sliding scale serves as an incentive for potential clients to engage counseling services with student CITs, it does not by itself address historical, social, cultural, and contextual trauma within communities that have reason to distrust motivations and purposes of university‐based initiatives (DePrince et al., 2022). For these reasons, CES clinics need to give thoughtful and informed consideration to both the program needs for counselor preparation and community needs for counseling services (DePrince et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a sliding scale serves as an incentive for potential clients to engage counseling services with student CITs, it does not by itself address historical, social, cultural, and contextual trauma within communities that have reason to distrust motivations and purposes of university‐based initiatives (DePrince et al., 2022). For these reasons, CES clinics need to give thoughtful and informed consideration to both the program needs for counselor preparation and community needs for counseling services (DePrince et al., 2022). The multicultural counseling and social justice counseling competencies are particularly relevant and informative for intentionally designing counseling services that honor the lived experiences and cultural backgrounds of historically underserved and systemically oppressed community members (Ratts et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%