2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-1947-0_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Roadmap Towards Airborne Wind Energy in the Utility Sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tables 1 and 2 summarize the chosen constraints and bounds specified for trajectory optimization. The path constraints and variable bounds used in this work are compiled from the available literature Licitra et al, 2016;Zanon et al, 2013b;Kruijff and Ruiterkamp, 2018) and are adapted to large-scale AWE systems.…”
Section: Generation Of Reference Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tables 1 and 2 summarize the chosen constraints and bounds specified for trajectory optimization. The path constraints and variable bounds used in this work are compiled from the available literature Licitra et al, 2016;Zanon et al, 2013b;Kruijff and Ruiterkamp, 2018) and are adapted to large-scale AWE systems.…”
Section: Generation Of Reference Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind turbine wakes result from the interaction between wind turbines and the atmospheric boundary layer, and are characterized by a wind speed deficit and increased turbulence intensity (Stevens and Meneveau, 2017;Porte-Agel et al, 2020). For airborne wind energy systems, wake effects are generally considered small (Kruijff and Ruiterkamp, 2018) or are often ignored (Echeverri et al, 2020) due to the large swept area and relatively small wing dimensions. Hence, recent studies investigating performance losses (Malz et al, 2018) or layout optimization (Roque et al, 2020) in airborne wind energy farms did not consider wake effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also provide an approximation of how the breakeven CapEx is distributed among different cost categories based on LCOE models for rigid wings (Echeverri et al 2020;Kruijff and Ruiterkamp 2018) and flexible wings (Heilmann 2012) in Table 5. As previously mentioned, some care must be taken when assessing these cost categories, as bottom-up LCOE projections for AWE systems are shrouded with uncertainty around the maturation of the supply chain for individual components.…”
Section: Cost Category Breakdownsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value proposition for deploying AWE systems offshore is primarily related to reduced foundation size, which makes up a significant portion of the CapEx of fixed-bottom and floating traditional wind turbines (Stehly, Beiter, and Duffy 2020). The low overturning moments of a tethered system directly connected to the foundation can drastically reduce the size, and therefore the cost, of the support structure (Kruijff and Ruiterkamp 2018). Additional benefits are often cited, such as the strong offshore wind resource and the reduced demand (relative to traditional wind systems) for expensive and scarce installation vessels to construct and service an offshore AWE plant.…”
Section: Viability For Offshore Windmentioning
confidence: 99%