DOI: 10.26868/25222708.2019.210570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Approach For The Calibration of the Material Properties in an Existing Wall

Abstract: Calibration of building energy simulation model is essential to obtain an accurate model able to emulate the actual energy behavior of existing buildings. There are two different approaches in the literature that are deterministic and Bayesian calibrations. The deterministic formulation of the calibration problem is ill-posed and consequently the pursuit of model discrepancy reduction may result in an over-fitting. On the contrary, Bayesian calibration assumes uncertain inputs and tries to reduce the uncertain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wall properties were then optimized in order to reproduce the measured heat flow densities on both sides and the calibrated wall models were implemented in the baseline model of the building floor. At this stage, the calibration procedure based on the optimization of RMSE and a penalty function was followed [12], due to the availability of design documentation and material certificates. The penalty function (P) is calculated as the sum of the individual penalty functions of each j-th calibrated material property (v j ), by penalizing values that deviate too far from the value declared in the data sheets (IG j ).…”
Section: Automatic Calibration With Detailed Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wall properties were then optimized in order to reproduce the measured heat flow densities on both sides and the calibrated wall models were implemented in the baseline model of the building floor. At this stage, the calibration procedure based on the optimization of RMSE and a penalty function was followed [12], due to the availability of design documentation and material certificates. The penalty function (P) is calculated as the sum of the individual penalty functions of each j-th calibrated material property (v j ), by penalizing values that deviate too far from the value declared in the data sheets (IG j ).…”
Section: Automatic Calibration With Detailed Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all of them may be representative of the actual building behavior outside of the calibration period. Validation, namely testing the calibrated model predictions on a different period, is usually recommended, often leading to a refinement of the calibrated model [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches use heat flux meter data to identify the local thermal transmittance or thermal resistance at the respective measurement spot [20,24]. Arregi et al compare a steady-state approach with a lumped resistance-capacitance that contains a single capacitor and a distributed capacitance model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%