2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust approach for tree segmentation in deciduous forests using small-footprint airborne LiDAR data

Abstract: Abstract.This paper presents a non-parametric approach for segmenting trees from airborne LiDAR data in deciduous forests. Based on the LiDAR point cloud, the approach collects crown information such as steepness and height on-the-fly to delineate crown boundaries, and most importantly, does not require a priori assumptions of crown shape and size. The approach segments trees iteratively starting from the tallest within a given area to the smallest until all trees have been segmented. To evaluate its performan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We then randomly selected a first return point within each cell and kept all returns associated with the LiDAR pulse generating that first return 49,56 . For segmenting trees within the decimated point cloud, we stratified the point cloud to its canopy layers and used the surface-based method presented by Hamraz et al 26 to segment trees within each layer. We evaluated the tree segmentation accuracy in terms of recall (measure of tree detection rate), precision (measure of correctness of the detected trees), and F-score (combined measure) (see Methods).…”
Section: Required Point Density For a Reasonable Segmentation Of Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then randomly selected a first return point within each cell and kept all returns associated with the LiDAR pulse generating that first return 49,56 . For segmenting trees within the decimated point cloud, we stratified the point cloud to its canopy layers and used the surface-based method presented by Hamraz et al 26 to segment trees within each layer. We evaluated the tree segmentation accuracy in terms of recall (measure of tree detection rate), precision (measure of correctness of the detected trees), and F-score (combined measure) (see Methods).…”
Section: Required Point Density For a Reasonable Segmentation Of Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to penetration capability, the LiDAR data contains vertical vegetation structure within which understory trees can also be segmented 17,18 . Although understory trees provide limited financial value and a minor proportion of total above ground biomass, they influence canopy succession and stand development, form a heterogeneous and dynamic habitat for numerous wildlife species, hence are an essential component of ecosystem functioning [19][20][21][22] .Several tree segmentation methods for LiDAR point clouds are by design unable to detect understory trees because they only consider top of vegetation or surface points [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . More recent methods process the entire LiDAR point clouds to utilize all vertical structure information representing different vegetation layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score is based on the tree height difference, which should be less than 30%, and the leaning angle between the crown apex and the stem location, which should also be less than 15° from nadir. The set of pairs with the maximum total score where each crown or stem location appears not more than once is selected using the Hungarian assignment algorithm and is regarded as the matched trees [17]. The number of matched trees (MT) is an indication of the tree segmentation quality.…”
Section: Tree Segmentation Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the tree segmentation algorithm presented by Hamraz et al (2016) as the single-processor building block to empirically assess the proposed distributed processing approach. The tree segmentation algorithm can efficiently be implemented such that T s (n) = O(n) (see Appendix A).…”
Section: Runtime and Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airborne LiDAR provides considerably less information about the mid-story trees due to decreased penetration of LiDAR points toward bottom canopy layers (Maguya et al, 2014;Reutebuch et al, 2003), hence detected tree rate is lower for mid-story trees (Duncanson et al, 2014;Hamraz et al, 2016). Also, the detected mid-story trees are likely biased to be smaller within the population of all existing mid-story trees because they are easier to detect when there is less canopy closure, which is associated with stand age and is minimal when stand is young and in general has smaller trees (Jules et al, 2008).…”
Section: Global Forest Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%