2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6569-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust decision-making approach for p-hub median location problems based on two-stage stochastic programming and mean-variance theory: a real case study

Abstract: The stochastic location-allocation p-hub median problems are related to long-term decisions made in risky situations. Due to the importance of this type of problems in real-world applications, the authors were motivated to propose an approach to obtain more reliable policies in stochastic environments considering the decision makers' preferences. Therefore, a systematic approach to make robust decisions for the single location-allocation p-hub median problem based on mean-variance theory and twostage stochasti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In classical hub location problems, network designers try to find suitable hub locations from all the node locations and then proper allocation of non-hub nodes to minimize the total transportation costs. Extending this to real world scenarios often involves network designers considering multiple objectives [4] or uncertain parameters [5,6,7] and network incompleteness [8,9]. In addition, the disruptive effects of natural disasters play an important role in determining the overall network performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In classical hub location problems, network designers try to find suitable hub locations from all the node locations and then proper allocation of non-hub nodes to minimize the total transportation costs. Extending this to real world scenarios often involves network designers considering multiple objectives [4] or uncertain parameters [5,6,7] and network incompleteness [8,9]. In addition, the disruptive effects of natural disasters play an important role in determining the overall network performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that the network has a maximum demand servicing policy. The second objective is related to system costs and includes the eight terms in the above model (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: The Hub Problem and The Reliable Version Of Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [25] presented a mean-variance optimization model for solving the track allocation problem that minimizes the occupation time costs in groups of turnouts at station bottlenecks. Ahmadi et al [26] developed a systematic approach to make robust decisions for the single location-allocation -hub median problem based on mean-variance theory. Li et al [27] presented a systematic approach integrated the mean-variance and scheduling to allow for schedule delay and trip time variability under uncertainty.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a risky situation, the DM exhibits three different behaviors in the forms of riskseeking, risk-neutral, and risk-averse that originated from concavity, linearity, and convexity of their utility function [26], respectively, as shown in Figure 2. Apparently, a rational DM prefers to choose a policy with a higher expected value and a lower variance of positive utilities.…”
Section: Mean-variance Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another research, the robust optimization framework proposed by Bertsimas and Sim [31] was studied to model the capacitated single and multiple allocation hub location problems with stochastic demands that may be changed according to a given interval [32]. More recently, Ahmadi et al [33] developed a systematic risk management approach to make robust decisions for the single locationallocation p-hub median problem based on mean-variance theory and two-stage stochastic programming concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%