2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3189743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Dynamic State Estimation Method for Power Systems Using Exponential Absolute Value-Based Estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (11), the aim is to minimize the flexibility contributions (namely the power changes) requested to the controllable sources. To this purpose, the impedance terms R and X are used to consider the effects that different nodes may have on the overall change of the voltage profile.…”
Section: Uncertainty-inclusive Voltage Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (11), the aim is to minimize the flexibility contributions (namely the power changes) requested to the controllable sources. To this purpose, the impedance terms R and X are used to consider the effects that different nodes may have on the overall change of the voltage profile.…”
Section: Uncertainty-inclusive Voltage Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the formulation of the voltage control used in this paper can be hence summarized as follows: minimize ∆P,∆Q (11) subject to (12), ( 13), ( 15), ( 16) (17) Different voltage control formulations could be potentially applied in the CBA-based meter placement strategy presented in Section III. The requirements for the control application are to integrate the voltage estimates together with the associated uncertainties, as given by the DSSE module, and to provide the set points of required active and reactive power adjustment for the flexibility sources in the grid as output.…”
Section: Uncertainty-inclusive Voltage Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that the impulsive process noise may occur because of the inaccurate system model [29]. In addition, PMU measurements may be contaminated because of cyber attacks or communication failure [30]. Therefore, the process noise distribution obeys 0.97N (0, 5 × 10 −4 ) + 0.03N (0, 5 × 10 −3 ), the measurement noise follows 0.95N (0, 1 × 10 −3 ) + 0.05N (0, 1 × 10 −2 ) and a 15% error is added to the voltage measurements from time steps 4 s to 6 s. The results obtained by DSE approaches are shown in figures 8 and 9.…”
Section: Case 4: Robust To Measurement Outliersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The robust statistical tool known as influence function is used to derive the SE error covariance. • Under different scenarios, the proposed DSE approach can provide higher estimation precision than the CKF [10], H-CKF [33], GM-UKF [29], EAV-UKF [30] and GCL-CKF [32] methods presented in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation