2022
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Framework Combining Image Processing and Deep Learning Hybrid Model to Classify Cardiovascular Diseases Using a Limited Number of Paper-Based Complex ECG Images

Abstract: Heart disease can be life-threatening if not detected and treated at an early stage. The electrocardiogram (ECG) plays a vital role in classifying cardiovascular diseases, and often physicians and medical researchers examine paper-based ECG images for cardiac diagnosis. An automated heart disease prediction system might help to classify heart diseases accurately at an early stage. This study aims to classify cardiac diseases into five classes with paper-based ECG images using a deep learning approach with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A false positive ( FP ) is an outcome where the model incorrectly predicts the positive class, while a false negative ( FN ) is an outcome where the model incorrectly predicts the negative class. For this research, we calculated the accuracy ( ACC ), precision, recall, specificity, F1-score, false positive rate ( FPR ), false negative rate ( FNR ), false discovery rate ( FDR ), negative predicted value ( NPV ), and the Matthew correlation coefficient ( MCC ) to evaluate the model’s performance [ 27 , 34 ]. …”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A false positive ( FP ) is an outcome where the model incorrectly predicts the positive class, while a false negative ( FN ) is an outcome where the model incorrectly predicts the negative class. For this research, we calculated the accuracy ( ACC ), precision, recall, specificity, F1-score, false positive rate ( FPR ), false negative rate ( FNR ), false discovery rate ( FDR ), negative predicted value ( NPV ), and the Matthew correlation coefficient ( MCC ) to evaluate the model’s performance [ 27 , 34 ]. …”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MobileNetV2 model consists of 53 layers and has 3.5 million trainable parameters [ 34 ]. It is made up of two types of blocks, each with three layers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The convolutional layers consume a large proportion of the computational, whereas the time pooling and fully connected layers only consume 5 to 10 percent of the computational time [73], [74]. We therefore focus on the time complexity of the convolutional layers; see Table 5 and 6 [74], [75], [76]. We compute the theoretical time complexity, which is defined in [73] as follows:…”
Section: A: Results Of the Model Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batch size altering can also improve the performance of the model. A large batch size might result in the model taking a long time to converge [75], [76]. Some studies [77], [78], [79] suggest that reducing the batch size enables the network to train more effectively, whereas increasing the batch size degrades the test performance.…”
Section: Vi) Case Study 6: Changing the Batch Sizementioning
confidence: 99%