2007
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2007.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments

Abstract: Abstract-Large-scale distributed applications are subject to frequent disruptions due to resource contention and failure. Such disruptions are inherently unpredictable and, therefore, robustness is a desirable property for the distributed operating environment. In this work, we describe and evaluate a robust topology for applications that operate on a spanning tree overlay network. Unlike previous work that is adaptive or reactive in nature, we take a proactive approach to robustness. The topology itself is ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The application-dependence of most of the related approaches unavoidably results in a low customization and optimization options. Some of these approaches [England et al, 2007, Jagadish et al, 2006b, Leitao et al, 2007 introduce additional costly protocols and management mechanisms to improve the customization of self-organization in dynamic scenarios. For example, custom tree repairing, load-balancing and decentralization mechanisms are some of them.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application-dependence of most of the related approaches unavoidably results in a low customization and optimization options. Some of these approaches [England et al, 2007, Jagadish et al, 2006b, Leitao et al, 2007 introduce additional costly protocols and management mechanisms to improve the customization of self-organization in dynamic scenarios. For example, custom tree repairing, load-balancing and decentralization mechanisms are some of them.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various topology control algorithms also use minimum spanning tree to build well connected sub graphs with provable cost relative to the optimum. Both centralized and distributed algorithms have been proposed to construct the topology in [6].They demonstrates its effectiveness through investigation of two clauses of distributed applications: Data gathering of sensor networks and data dissemination in divisible load scheduling. Also an in depth study of design and analysis of gossip algorithm has been taken forward for averaging in an arbitrarily connected number of nodes [7].It examines the averaging problem under the gossip constraint for an arbitrary networks and finds that the averaging time of the gossip algorithm depends on the second largest Eigen values of a double stochastic matrix characterizing the algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the shortest path for constructing a spanning tree because each processing node's communication delay is guaranteed to be a minimum. Thus, compared to other well-known spanning trees, such as shortest hop spanning tree, minimum spanning tree [21], and robust spanning tree [22], SPST usually admits better performance. Now we will introduce how SSS works.…”
Section: Static Scheduling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%