2010
DOI: 10.3808/jei.201000176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Statistical Analysis Approach for Pollutant Loadings in Urban Rivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained information can be used for Monte Carlo simulation to generate a set of data required for risk assessment. Some other parameters in Equation (1) are usually assumed as constants, such as the chemical-specific dermal permeability constant as 0.6 cm/h for dermal contact, absorption into the bloodstream as 6% and the conversion factor as 10 −6 kg/mg [18,25]. According to a survey, children mainly play in the water at Site 4.…”
Section: Other Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained information can be used for Monte Carlo simulation to generate a set of data required for risk assessment. Some other parameters in Equation (1) are usually assumed as constants, such as the chemical-specific dermal permeability constant as 0.6 cm/h for dermal contact, absorption into the bloodstream as 6% and the conversion factor as 10 −6 kg/mg [18,25]. According to a survey, children mainly play in the water at Site 4.…”
Section: Other Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this reason, in the summer of 2005, the Northeast Avalon Atlantic Coastal Action Program (NAACAP) initiated a monitoring project on the Nut Brook stream system. In that report, the collection and analysis of water and sediment samples had been done for the purpose of compiling baseline information, helping NAACAP to determine and analyze the impact extent of environmental damage coming from heavy metal loadings and extensive sedimentation [19,25].…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty is one of the major hinders in improving the efficiency of MSW management, which may arise from a variety of possible sources. Such sources include but not limited to incomplete information, errors in sampling, subjective judgment, random variations of and dynamic interactions among operating factors, approximations and assumptions in measurement, and changes of environmental conditions (Huang et al, 1993;Chen et al, 2008b;Ping et al, 2010). The uncertainties lead to difficulties in developing optimization models for supporting decision making in MSW management and impair the confidence of decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In response to the above concerns, a number of optimization methods were developed for allocating and managing water in more efficient ways under uncertainty (Luo et al 2003(Luo et al , 2007Jung et al 2006;Wu et al 2008;He et al 2010;Ping et al 2010;Jing and Chen 2011). Among these methods, the two-stage stochastic programming (TSP), as a kind of stochastic optimization method, was widely used for dealing with randomness in water resources management systems (Loucks et al 1981;Edirisinghe and Ziemba 1994;Wagner et al 1994;Huang and Loucks 2000;Li et al 2007;Lu et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%