2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.127.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Role of Low Energy Grain Boundaries in the Abnormal Grain Growth in Fe-3%Si Alloy

Abstract: Low energy grain boundaries were considered to be important in abnormal grain growth by theoretical deduction. The disorientation angles and coincidence site lattice grain boundaries distribution of more than 20 Goss grains and their neighboring matrix grains in primary recrystallized Fe-3%Si alloy were investigated using an electron backscatter diffraction method. It was found that the frequency of low energy grain boundaries of Goss grains which are more likely to abnormally grow are higher than their neighb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the mechanisms proposed in the literature for SAGG are based on the idea that differences in the mobility of boundaries between grains cause some grains to preferentially grow at the expense of others [3,[32][33][34][35][36]. A grain's orientation relative to the majority texture is thought to significantly influence the mobility of its boundaries by controlling boundary character [32].…”
Section: Microstructure and Crystallographic Texturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the mechanisms proposed in the literature for SAGG are based on the idea that differences in the mobility of boundaries between grains cause some grains to preferentially grow at the expense of others [3,[32][33][34][35][36]. A grain's orientation relative to the majority texture is thought to significantly influence the mobility of its boundaries by controlling boundary character [32].…”
Section: Microstructure and Crystallographic Texturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSL boundaries have higher mobility and lower energy compared to the general grain boundaries [20]. Therefore, Coincident Site Lattice boundaries have less capability compared to Zenner Pinning [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%