A role of melatonin in the treatment of low back pain

Kurganova, Yu. M.; Данилов, А. Б.

doi:10.17116/jnevro20151154130-35

Cited by 12 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies included participants with chronic non-specific LBP 41,42,51,53,54,56 (n ¼ 6), chronic non-specific neck pain 44,52,55,58e60 (n ¼ 6), any spinal pain 34e36,61 (n ¼ 4), knee OA 32,40,43,57 (n ¼ 4), general OA 27,33,45 (n ¼ 3), and a combination of people with spinal pain and/or OA 37 (n ¼ 1). All studies classified chronic LBP as pain lasting longer than at least 3e6 months.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sleep interventions and intervention protocols varied across included studies. ESI included CBT 27,32e37,45 (n ¼ 8), melatonin 42,60 (n ¼ 2), and eszopiclone 41 (n ¼ 1). Other sleep interventions included pillows 43,52,55,58,59 (n ¼ 5), exercise 40,44,53 (n ¼ 3), massage 54,56 (n ¼ 2), singing bowls 61 (n ¼ 1), acupuncture 57 (n ¼ 1), and mattresses 51 (n ¼ 1).…”

Section: Sleep and Comparison Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other sleep interventions included pillows 43,52,55,58,59 (n ¼ 5), exercise 40,44,53 (n ¼ 3), massage 54,56 (n ¼ 2), singing bowls 61 (n ¼ 1), acupuncture 57 (n ¼ 1), and mattresses 51 (n ¼ 1). Nine studies combined a sleep intervention in addition to a pain intervention: CBT for insomnia with CBT for pain 33,35,37,45 (n ¼ 4), a sleep pharmacological intervention with a pain pharmacological intervention 41,42 (n ¼ 2), pillow with physiotherapy intervention 52,55 (n ¼ 2), and acupuncture for sleep with acupuncture for pain 57 (n ¼ 1). All interventions except pillows, mattresses and pharmacological interventions were delivered faceto-face in individual or group settings.…”

Section: Sleep and Comparison Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There were a variety of comparators: sham/behavioural placebo 32,41,42,57,60,61 (n ¼ 6), education/wait list control 27,33e37,40,43,45,52,54e56 (n ¼ 13), or pain interventions 33,35,44,45,51,53,57e59 (n ¼ 9). Investigations into adverse events were reported in seven studies 32,40,41,53,57,60 .…”

Section: Comparison Groups and Adverse Eventsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Sleep interventions for osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ferreira

Pinheiro

et al. 2019

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To determine if sleep interventions improve pain and sleep in people with osteoarthritis (OA) and/or spinal pain compared to control/placebo. Design: Medline, Embase, AMED, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro were searched from their inception date to July 2017. Keywords relating to "sleep", "OA", "spinal pain", and "randomized controlled trial (RCT)" were combined. Included RCTs investigated the use of sleep interventions for people with OA and/or spinal pain, and measured at least one sleep and health related outcome. Meta-analyses were performed to pool mean differences for pain and sleep quality. PROSPERO: CRD42016036315. Results: Of 1445 unique records, 24 studies were included. Sixteen studies included participants with spinal pain, seven with OA, and one included a mixed population. Sleep interventions included established sleep interventions (ESI) [cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and pharmacological interventions], and a range of others. Intervention periods ranged from 4 to 10 weeks. Thirteen studies were of moderate to high quality (PEDro ! 6/10). Due to high heterogeneity between studies we also performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses. ESI decreased Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) for people with low back pain (LBP) (pooled mean difference: À6.78/28, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): [À9.47, À4.09], I 2 ¼ 40%) and OA (À2.41, [À4.19, À0.63], 0%). However ESI decreased pain for people with LBP (pooled mean difference: visual analogue scale (VAS) À12.77/100, 95% CI: [À17.57, À7.97], I 2 ¼ 0%), but not OA (À2.32, [À7.18, 2.54], 27%). Conclusion: ESI appeared to improve sleep and pain for people with LBP, and sleep for people with OA. However more vigorous studies need to be conducted.

show abstract

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sleep and Comparison Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sleep and Comparison Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Comparison Groups and Adverse Eventsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Sleep interventions for osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ferreira

Pinheiro

et al. 2019

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The patients were stratified into six groups making three comparison pairs. The patients in study group 1 (n = 31) took one tablet of Artra conclusion that the addition of melatonin to the standard treatment scheme increases its efficacy in back pain [19].…”

Section: Melatonin In Chronic Back Painmentioning

confidence: 99%

Melatonin in Chronic Pain Syndromes

Kurganova

Данилов

2017

Neurosci Behav Physi

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluation of sleep health documentation and sleep‐related intervention by physiatrists treating musculoskeletal disorders: A retrospective investigation

Deo,

Leupold,

Rau

et al. 2024

PM&R

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionSleep health is linked to pain, function, and global health. Unfortunately, sleep health may not be consistently addressed as a part of musculoskeletal care.ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe the frequency of sleep health documentation and intervention by musculoskeletal physiatrists. Additionally, patient‐reported outcome measures were compared between patients with and without sleep impairment. We hypothesized that sleep health is documented and addressed in less than half of initial patient encounters, and that patients with a sleep impairment have worse patient‐reported outcomes scores compared to those without sleep impairment.DesignRetrospective studySettingTertiary Orthopedic HospitalInterventionsNoneMain Outcome MeasuresFrequency of provider documentation of sleep health, frequency and characteristics of sleep health intervention provided, and patient‐reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS)‐10 mental health and physical health scores.ResultsInitial visits for a musculoskeletal condition of 39,452 patients from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2022 were included. Documentation of sleep health was found in 33.0% (13,002/39,452) of patients. Of those with sleep health documentation, 59.2% (7,697/13,002) were classified as having a sleep impairment. Only 19.0% of patients were provided with sleep‐related education or other intervention. Patients with a sleep impairment had worse PROMIS‐10 mental health and physical health scores (p<0.001), as compared to those without a sleep impairment.ConclusionsPatients with sleep impairment had worse mental and physical health scores than those without sleep impairment, and only 19.0% received sleep health intervention. These data suggest that sleep impairment is common in patients presenting for evaluation of a musculoskeletal condition, and advanced provider education and tools to help patients improve their sleep health are needed.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

show abstract

A role of melatonin in the treatment of low back pain

Cited by 12 publications

References 29 publications

Sleep interventions for osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Sleep interventions for osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Melatonin in Chronic Pain Syndromes

Evaluation of sleep health documentation and sleep‐related intervention by physiatrists treating musculoskeletal disorders: A retrospective investigation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About